CJI D Y Chandrachud led bench, Today (April 5th) issued an interim stay on the Allahabad HC’s order, which deemed the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, unconstitutional and contrary to secular principles. The Court also sent notices to the Centre, Uttar Pradesh government, and other concerned parties regarding the petitions challenging the high court’s ruling.
The Allahabad High Court Today (March 22nd) declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 unconstitutional and a violation of secularism. The court directed the government to accommodate madrasa students into the formal education system. This decision will lead to the ceasing of government financial aid to madrasas and their eventual abolition.
On sunday (17th March): The Election Commission of India disclosed details about electoral bonds, revealing significant financial flows to political parties. The data lacks donor identities, maintaining anonymity in political funding. The Supreme Court’s recent ruling challenges the secrecy of the scheme and advocates for more transparency in political party funding, sparking discussions about regulation.
The Supreme Court of India has struck down the electoral bonds scheme, emphasizing the voters’ entitlement to information about electoral candidates. The scheme was found to disproportionately impact this right and failed to be the least restrictive measure in curbing black money. The Court’s decision marks a significant step towards enhancing transparency and equity in political funding.
The Supreme Court of India declared Electoral Bonds unconstitutional, garnering praise from the Congress party. The ruling emphasizes prioritizing votes over financial influence, aligning with the party’s commitment to transparency and democratic integrity. This pivotal decision highlights the importance of upholding democratic principles and transparency in political financing.
The Supreme Court declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, annulling the amendments to the Income Tax and Representation of People Act. The scheme’s anonymity violated rights to information and expression. The State Bank of India was instructed to stop issuing electoral bonds, and transparency on donations and recipients was mandated. The decision addressed the unequal impact of corporate and individual contributions.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, has declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, invalidating anonymous political party donations. The Court cited violations of the right to information and free speech, mandating disclosure of bond recipients and refunding unused bonds. The scheme, introduced in 2018, aimed for transparency but faced criticism for fostering corruption and favoritism.