Uttarakhand is the first Indian state to implement a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) requiring live-in relationship registration, effective January 27, 2025. This law standardizes legal provisions across communities. While nationwide UCC discussions continue, existing laws and Supreme Court rulings govern live-in relationships. Uttarakhand’s initiative may influence future legal reforms.
Uttarakhand has become the first state in India to implement the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), and reports about mandatory religious certificates for live-in relationships have gone viral. However, the government clarified that this certificate is required only if the couple falls under a prohibited category of relationships. The UCC simplifies live-in registrations with just four essential documents and ensures equal rights for all residents, banning polygamy and child marriage.
Uttarakhand has implemented the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), which mandates the registration of live-in relationships, making it the first state in India to do so. The UCC provides legal recognition, ensures equal property rights for children, and imposes penalties for non-compliance. This progressive law aims to promote equality and social justice in civil matters.
On January 27, 2025, Uttarakhand became the first Indian state to implement the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), promoting equality in civil laws across gender, caste, and religion. Chief Minister Dhami highlighted the UCC’s role in ensuring uniformity in marriage, divorce, and inheritance laws, introducing mandatory marriage registration and fulfilling a key electoral promise.
The Uttarakhand government is set to implement the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) starting today. This new law will replace personal laws based on religion with a common set of rules for all citizens. It will govern matters like marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption, aiming to ensure equality and justice. While some see it as a step toward fairness, others believe it could affect cultural and religious practices.
Former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi emphasized the significance of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) as a vital step toward national integration. He stated that implementing the UCC does not conflict with Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which safeguard the right to religion. According to Gogoi, the UCC can foster unity while respecting religious freedoms. This view supports the Constitution’s aim of promoting equality and unity among different communities.
The Supreme Court collegium, led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, conducted interviews for high court judgeships to improve candidate evaluation. This follows controversies involving Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s remarks at a VHP event, raising concerns about judicial impartiality. The collegium aims to enhance transparency and integrity in judicial appointments through personal interactions.
Today, On 10th December, VHP Chief Alok Kumar defended Allahabad High Court Justice Shekhar Yadav’s controversial remarks supporting majoritarianism and the Uniform Civil Code during a VHP event. Amid criticism, Kumar asserted that the justice’s views reflect democratic principles, emphasizing respect for majority sentiments while reiterating the need for awareness sessions despite potential judicial implications.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad event, urging respect for Hindu practices and advocating for the Uniform Civil Code. He criticized practices like triple talaq and called for all religions to abandon harmful customs. His remarks highlighted the need for cultural respect in India.
The Supreme Court will hear Dr. K.A. Paul’s petition regarding the Tirupati laddu controversy on November 22. The case involves allegations of adulteration in the sacred prasadam, causing distress among Hindus. An independent Special Investigation Team has been ordered to ensure a thorough inquiry into the claims of compromised quality.
![[Justice Shekhar Yadav's 'Majority' Remark] "I'm Not Apologetic": VHP Chief Alok Kumar](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-5-7.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)