A Delhi court has denied the bail plea of Lok Sabha MP Engineer Rashid, arrested in 2019 for his involvement in a 2017 terror funding case related to militant activities in Jammu and Kashmir. The NIA argued against his release, citing that he should not exploit his MP status to evade imprisonment.
Today, On 19th March, A Delhi court is set to decide on the bail plea of Member of Parliament Engineer Rashid on March 21 in connection with a terror funding case. Rashid, who was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), seeks relief from custody. The case involves allegations of financial support for terrorist activities.
Today, On 18th March, The Delhi High Court has scheduled the hearing of Engineer Rashid’s plea to attend Parliament on March 25. Rashid, an independent MP from Jammu and Kashmir, seeks permission to participate in parliamentary proceedings. Currently in judicial custody over a terror funding case, he has moved the court to exercise his rights as an elected representative. The court’s decision will impact his ability to fulfill legislative duties while in custody.
Today, On 17th March, The National Investigation Agency (NIA) told the Delhi High Court that Engineer Rashid cannot use his legislator status to seek reprieve in legal proceedings. The agency argued that his position as an elected representative does not grant him immunity from prosecution. Rashid, currently in custody under UAPA charges, had sought relief citing his political role. The Court is set to examine the matter while considering legal precedents in such cases.
Today, On 12th March, The High Court sought the National Investigation Agency’s (NIA) response to Jammu and Kashmir MP Engineer Rashid’s plea to attend Parliament. Rashid, currently in custody under terror-related charges, has requested permission to fulfill his parliamentary duties. The court’s directive puts the spotlight on the balance between legal proceedings and legislative responsibilities. A decision on the matter is expected after the NIA submits its stand.
Today, On 7th March, The Supreme Court issued a notice on a petition seeking proper accommodations for persons with disabilities (PwDs) in prisons. The plea highlights the lack of specialized facilities, forcing PwDs to stay in the same conditions as non-disabled inmates without necessary support. It cites the cases of G.N. Saibaba and Stan Swamy, raising concerns over the treatment of disabled prisoners. The petition calls for reforms to ensure humane and accessible conditions for PwDs in custody.
India has strongly criticized a security breach during External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s visit to the UK, condemning the actions of separatist and extremist elements.
Sharjeel Imam told the Delhi High Court that he is being prosecuted twice for the same speech linked to the 2020 riots. He was arrested in January 2020 for allegedly delivering provocative speeches that incited violence during anti-CAA protests. Imam argued that multiple cases for the same offense violate legal principles. The case highlights ongoing legal battles over free speech and dissent.
The Supreme Court Today (Feb 28) criticized the Chhattisgarh Police for misusing UAPA to nullify its previous order protecting an accused from arrest. The Court granted him bail and warned of contempt action.
The Supreme Court granted NewsClick a one-week protection from any coercive action over a tax demand. A bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, however, rejected a writ petition filed by PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt Ltd. The petition was filed directly under Article 32 of the Constitution. The court’s decision provides temporary relief but does not settle the tax dispute.
