During a Supreme Court hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi humorously declined to offer solicitor general Tushar Mehta an internship under him. The hearing involved an original suit by the West Bengal government against the Centre concerning CBI investigations without state consent. Solicitor General Mehta emphasized the importance of Article 131, stating that the CBI operates independently from the Union of India.
The West Bengal government presented its case before the Supreme Court Today (May 2nd), opposing CBI investigations in the state. They argued that when the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is permitted to conduct probes within a state, it’s often followed by the involvement of the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
![[Breaking] CBI is Not the Control of Centre, in West Bengal Govt's Suit: SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Solicitor General clarified that the CBI operates independently and is not controlled by the Union government, countering West Bengal’s lawsuit. The Supreme Court plans to hear the case and emphasized the urgency of concluding arguments before the summer recess. The outcome will set a crucial precedent for the CBI’s authority in such matters.
On 28th March(Today), the Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, delivered a lecture at Jindal Global Law School titled “The Journey of the Supreme Court of India on the Fundamental Rights.” He emphasized the struggle and evolution of fundamental rights, from the Government of India Act of 1935 to present-day challenges, and highlighted the pivotal role of Justice Bhagwati in shaping India’s legal system.
Today (22nd March) The Supreme Court set guidelines for Lokayukta appointments, emphasizing the need for meaningful consultation with opposition leaders. This follows a plea contesting the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta’s appointment without Leader of the Opposition consultation. The court aims to ensure transparency and statutory compliance in such appointments nationwide. The plea challenges the appointment’s transparency and demands its annulment.
The Supreme Court today dismissed the government’s concerns about misuse of the Electoral Bonds scheme and emphasized the need for transparency. Solicitor General Mehta expressed concerns about distortions in statistics and social media misuse, but the Court focused on upholding the rule of law. The Court instructed the State Bank of India to disclose all pertinent information, including alphanumeric codes associated with the bonds.
Eminent jurist and Senior Advocate Fali Nariman’s passing was mourned by Law Chakra and Team, with condolences from the legal fraternity. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud remembered Nariman as a compassionate mentor, while Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal also paid tribute to his towering intellect and exceptional nature.
CJI DY Chandrachud highlighted the imperative role of law officers in upholding judicial sanctity and ethical conduct at the Commonwealth Attorney and Solicitors Generals Conference. He emphasized the need for inclusivity in legal education and technology’s potential in enhancing transparency. His vision promotes fairness, integrity, and inclusivity in the legal profession and judiciary.
The Centre emphasized to the Supreme Court the need for national reflection in institutions of national significance like Aligarh Muslim University. Solicitor General highlighted the absence of reservation and the institution’s importance. The case revolves around AMU’s minority status, with ongoing deliberation by a seven-judge constitution bench. The hearing continues on Wednesday.
In a recent hearing of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) case, the Solicitor General of India voiced opposition to a 1981 parliamentary amendment granting minority status to AMU. This led to astonishment from the Chief Justice and a broader discussion on the role of law officers in supporting parliamentary amendments, raising complex constitutional law questions in India.