EXCLUSIVE | China’s AI-powered DeepSeek offers a fresh take on India’s most influential Chief Justices, from Justice P.N. Bhagwati’s PIL revolution to Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s progressive reforms. While the title of the “best” CJI remains subjective, their landmark judgments have shaped India’s legal landscape. What does China’s AI think? Find out here!
The Supreme Court of India, in a groundbreaking judgment, described itself as a “search engine of truth,” emphasizing its duty to uncover facts using procedural and substantive laws. Addressing a 1994 case involving juvenility claims, the Court highlighted judicial failures and societal responsibility toward children in conflict with the law. The appellant, initially sentenced to death, was finally granted relief with directions for rehabilitation and reintegration into society, showcasing the judiciary’s commitment to truth and justice.
Supreme Court Justice Dipankar Dutta highlighted the importance of dissenting judgments in the judicial system during an event in Kolkata. He clarified that dissent is not aimed at criticizing majority opinions but rather offering alternative perspectives, promoting critical discussion and future legal interpretations. Dutta emphasized that historical dissenting opinions have often proven correct over time.
