Casual Exercise of Judicial Power: Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation After Trial Judge Invokes Non-Existent SC/ST Act Provision

The Allahabad High Court has sought an explanation from a Trial Judge in Aligarh for summoning an accused under a non-existent provision of the SC/ST Act, highlighting a potential violation of the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21, pointing casual exercise of judicial power.

Committed Grave Error Without Understanding Criminal Law: Madras High Court Sends Trial Judge for Judicial Training

The Madras High Court observed that the trial court “committed a grave error without understanding the fundamental principle of criminal law” while convicting the appellant. The Court set aside the conviction and directed the trial judge to undergo judicial training.

Delhi High Court Slaps Rs.50k Costs on Litigants for False Bias Claim: Figment of Infertile Imagination

Delhi High Court imposed Rs.50,000 costs on litigants for fabricating a false bias claim against a trial judge, terming it a “figment of infertile imagination,” while stressing that misleading assertions cannot be allowed to derail judicial proceedings.

“Courts Must Play an Active Role in Trials, Not Merely Passive Recorders”: SC Clarifies Public Prosecutor and Trial Judge Roles in Cross-Examination

The Supreme Court of India highlighted the need for active participation of courts in trials, especially when public prosecutors neglect their duties. The court stressed the importance of thorough cross-examinations by public prosecutors to uncover the truth. Emphasizing the duty of courts to ascertain truth, it criticized prosecutorial and judicial failures.