Today, On 26th September, the Delhi High Court ordered Prashant Desai to remove an Instagram video criticizing Zydus’s trademarked product, Complan. The court found the video to be disparaging and ruled against trademark infringement following Zydus’s lawsuit. Desai has two weeks to take down the content from all platforms.
![[Trademark Battle] Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Forest Essentials in Case Against Baby Forest](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shared-image-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court’s Division Bench, comprising Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tara Vitasta Ganju, observed a potential error in the single-judge’s refusal to grant interim relief to Forest Essentials in a trademark dispute against Baby Forest. The Bench issued a notice to Baby Forest and scheduled further hearing on September 9, acknowledging merit in Forest Essentials’ appeal.
![[Moti Mahal vs. Daryaganj] Battle Over 'Butter Chicken' Trademark in Delhi High Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-90.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 27th May, Moti Mahal challenged Daryaganj’s trademark on ‘Butter Chicken’ in the Delhi High Court, claiming it as a generic term. The court will address this in July. Moti Mahal also disputes Daryaganj’s tagline, alleging deceptive practices. Legal proceedings are ongoing, with advocates representing both sides. The case is set for a hearing on May 29.
The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of Emami, prohibiting HUL from using the ‘Glow & Handsome’ trademark for men’s care products. This decision highlights the significance of protecting intellectual property rights in the beauty industry. Amid intense competition in the beauty sector, the ruling sets a precedent for similar trademark disputes, impacting future legal battles.
MakeMyTrip Today approached the Supreme Court, alleging infringement of its trademark through Google Ads displaying links to rival company Booking.com. MakeMyTrip claims this diverts customers and benefits Google financially. They challenge a previous ruling and question the court’s jurisdiction. The matter is set to be heard by the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud.