In light of recent disruptions in the Ghaziabad District Court, the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Association (UPJSA) convened an emergency online meeting to discuss mounting concerns about abuse, threats, and vandalism by certain advocates toward judicial officers. The association expressed alarm over an incident in which a group of advocates allegedly pressured, verbally abused, and vandalized the courtroom of the District Judge, Ghaziabad, affecting judicial dignity and morale. The meeting attendees condemned the incident, stressing that such behavior undermines the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court instructed today (17th Sept) the CBI to provide an update on the R G Kar Medical College and Hospital case, emphasizing the importance of public interest and transparency. They also refused to halt live proceedings despite concerns raised by the West Bengal government. The Court stressed the need to protect the victim’s identity and instructed Wikipedia to remove sensitive information. Additionally, the CBI was asked to submit a status report on the financial irregularities in medical departments. The case involves the rape and murder of a 31-year-old doctor, leading to multiple unresolved questions and investigations into potential corruption and evidence tampering.
The Supreme Court of India found a police inspector and a magistrate guilty of unlawfully arresting and remanding an accused, in violation of a standing court order. The court held them accountable for contempt, emphasizing the duty to uphold the rule of law and protect citizens’ rights, amounting to a serious breach of trust.
The Uttarakhand High Court granted police protection to an interfaith couple in a live-in relationship, provided they register their relationship under the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) within 48 hours. The Court’s decision referenced the Supreme Court’s judgment in Lata Singh v. State of UP, which offers protection to interfaith couples. The UCC in Uttarakhand mandates registration for live-in couples.
![[Journalist Assault] AAP Media Coordinator's Bail Dismissed by Court Citing 'Not Maintainable'](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, The Tis Hazari Court in Delhi dismissed AAP Media Coordinator Vikas Kumar Yogi’s anticipatory bail plea in the journalist assault case for procedural inadequacy as the mentioned offenses are currently bailable. The court highlighted legal challenges faced by the accused, citing a typographical error in the police statement and lack of grounds for custodial interrogation.
On Monday(1st March), The Madras High Court refused police protection to BJP member ‘Milakaipodi’ Venkatesan, facing 49 red sanders smuggling cases. Justice Anand Venkatesh highlighted concerns over granting protection to individuals with criminal backgrounds, citing the importance of upholding the justice system’s credibility. The court criticized the Tamil Nadu police for their inconsistent stance on the matter.
