Raja Raghuvanshi’s Shocking Murder Orchestrated by Wife and Her Lover: All 5 Accused Back in Court Today

All five accused in the Shillong honeymoon murder case of Indore businessman Raja Raghuvanshi will be shown in court again today as police ask for more custody to continue the investigation.

Honeymoon Murder Mystery: Sonam Raghuvanshi Accused in Shocking Killing Declared Mentally Fit, Family Demands Narco Test

Sonam Raghuvanshi, accused of killing her husband Raja during their honeymoon in Meghalaya, has been found mentally sound after a psychiatric test. The grieving family seeks deeper investigation and narco tests for all five accused.

Has the Supreme Court Failed Men in India? No Right to DNA Test in Adultery

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling denying a husband’s right to a DNA test in cases of adultery is a severe injustice against men, violating their constitutional rights to equality, personal liberty, and legal remedy. By prioritizing the presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act over scientific evidence, the judgment forces innocent men into unwanted fatherhood, encourages marital fraud, and deprives them of a fundamental legal defense. This decision contradicts previous court rulings that have allowed DNA tests when paternity is contested, making urgent legal reforms necessary to prevent wrongful paternity claims and ensure justice for men in India.

Supreme Court Allows Objections to Clinical Trial Rules Amid Concerns Over Use of Poor Citizens

The Supreme Court of India permitted a petitioner to challenge the Central Government’s clinical trial rules, amid concerns over exploitation of poor citizens. Despite recent regulatory amendments aimed at improving safety and compliance, criticisms persist regarding inadequacies in protecting participants’ rights. The court emphasized trials must prioritize the citizens’ welfare over corporate interests.

“Test to Filter Article 32 Petitions?”: SC Judge Justice Abhay S Oka

Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S Oka Yesterday (April 16th) proposed initiating a debate and dialogue with stakeholders to determine whether a criterion should be established to assess when the Supreme Court can consider petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.