Terrorist Pannun Murder | Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Ex-RAW Officer Vikas Yadav Named by US

In the Pannun murder plot case, a Delhi court has issued a non-bailable warrant against ex-RAW officer Vikas Yadav, who has been named by the United States, intensifying the legal and diplomatic spotlight on him.

Pahalgam Terror Attack| ‘A Premeditated, Religiously Motivated Massacre’: Adv. Vineet Jindal Urges PM Modi for Immediate Action

Today, On 24th April, Advocate Vineet Jindal urges PM Modi to take decisive and uncompromising action following the Pahalgam terror attack, warning it will not be the last without strong measures. He stresses the need for firm steps to ensure national security.

Delhi High Court: ‘Supporting A Terrorist Organization In The Form Of Networking, Is Clearly Prohibited As Per UAPA’

The Delhi High Court has dismissed Zafar Abbas’s appeal against his bail denial, linking him to the terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The court highlighted substantial evidence of his involvement in recruiting workers for LeT and illegal financial activities. Abbas’s defense arguments were insufficient, leading to the affirmation of the trial court’s decision.

[BREAKING] Bhima-Koregaon Case: Bombay High Court Judge Sarang Kotwal Recuses from Hearing Appeal Of Dr. Anand Teltumbde

Civil rights activist Anand Teltumbde, who has been named as an accused by the Pune Police in the Elgar Parishad-Koregaon Bhima case, denied all charges against him and asked the Bombay High Court to quash the FIR filed against him. Bombay: Bombay High Court Judge, Justice Sarang Kotwal recuses from hearing an appeal filed by […]

Mere Association with Dawood Ibrahim Doesn’t Constitute Terror Gang Membership Under UAPA: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court ruled that mere association with Dawood Ibrahim does not automatically constitute membership in a terrorist gang under the UAPA. The court clarified the distinction between individual activities and those of a terrorist gang, granting bail to the accused due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged offenses.

Bowbazar Blast | Cal HC Stays Single-Judge Order to Consider Early Release of Convict

The Calcutta High Court Today (May 13th) stayed a single judge order directing the West Bengal State Sentence Review Board (SSRB) to consider the early release of Mohd Khalid, who has been in jail for the last 31 years after being convicted in the Bowbazar bomb blast case of 1993.

Delhi High Court Seeks Delhi Police Response on P. Purkayastha’s Plea Against UAPA FIR in NewsClick Arrests

The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Delhi Police following a plea by Prabir Purkayastha challenging the UAPA FIR against him. The case involves allegations of illicit foreign funds, press freedom, and the use of UAPA against journalists. This legal challenge holds significant implications for media freedom and the application of anti-terrorism laws in India.

Central Government Assures Delhi High Court of Medical Care for Yasin Malik

The Delhi High Court has received a plea from Yasin Malik for medical treatment at AIIMS. The Central Government has committed to providing necessary medical treatment for his cardiac and kidney conditions. Despite facing life imprisonment, the government’s assurance highlights its responsibility towards ensuring Malik’s health needs are met in compliance with legal standards.

Delhi High Court to Hear Today Plea Demanding Death Penalty for Yasin Malik.

The plea for the enhancement of Malik’s sentence to the death penalty was filed by the family of an Indian Air Force officer. In a significant development, the Delhi High Court is scheduled today to consider a plea that seeks the imposition of the death penalty on Yasin Malik, the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front […]

Kerala Court Sentences Man to 10 Years in Jail Under UAPA for Supporting ISIS and Promoting Terrorism

A Kerala court sentenced Riyas to 10 years in prison for promoting ISIS ideology and activities in India, imposing a ₹50,000 fine. The judgment highlighted his radicalization, dissemination of ISIS propaganda through social media, and involvement in criminal conspiracy. It emphasized the need for deterrence and public order maintenance in combating extremism. The case underscores challenges posed by digital radicalization and the importance of a strong legal framework for addressing such threats.