![[3.99 Crore Seizure Case] Tamil Nadu Govt. Moves SC Against Order Asking Police Not to 'disturb' BJP's Leader Kesava Vinayagan](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-44-1.png?resize=400%2C367&ssl=1)
The Tamil Nadu Government today has contested a Madras High Court decision restraining the police from summoning BJP leader Kesava Vinayagan in a cash seizure case. The Supreme Court has asked for Vinayagan’s response. The case involves the seizure of Rs 3.99 crore from train passengers, one of whom has BJP affiliations. The case is scheduled for September 20.
Today, On 9th July, Congress leader P. Chidambaram supports the formation of a committee in Tamil Nadu to suggest amendments to new criminal laws, noting that state legislatures have the authority to make such changes. This move aligns with the constitutional competency of state legislatures to amend criminal laws, emphasizing the significance of the Concurrent List in India’s federal structure.
Today, On 25th June, The Supreme Court directed the Tamil Nadu government to allow unrestricted movement of All India Permit buses within the state. The order came in response to a plea by inter-state bus operators, who argued that the state’s directives contradict the Motor Vehicles Act. The court has instructed authorities to ensure unhindered passage for these buses.
The Justice K Chandru Committee proposed banning ‘Tilak’ and colored wristbands in Tamil Nadu’s educational institutions to foster a secular and inclusive environment. The committee aims to discourage discrimination and promote unity among students of diverse backgrounds. Additionally, the report suggests measures to combat caste-based discrimination and violence, emphasizing the importance of upholding social justice and inclusion.
Yesterday, On 12th June, The Madras High Court mandated that transgender individuals be recognized as a special category, separate from male or female classifications, for employment and education opportunities. Age relaxations and distinct criteria for job and educational opportunities are to be provided. This decision was prompted by a petition filed by a transgender individual denied consideration in civil service exams. The court also criticized the unsustainable approach of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission.
Today(on 10th June), Madras High Court praises Tamil Nadu’s inclusive LGBTQIA+ policy. The court applauds the state’s progressive stance, extends the deadline, and directs curriculum revision to ban conversion therapy. Justice Venkatesh emphasizes the significance of these efforts in setting a national example and fostering an inclusive environment for the LGBTQ+ community, receiving wide appreciation.
![[Nithari Killings Case]| Supreme Court to Hear Plea Against Acquittal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-43-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today,22nd April, Tamil Nadu rejected Survey of India’s findings in the Mullaperiyar Dam Case, leading to a July 10 deadline. The Supreme Court demanded detailed affidavits from both sides. The conflict involves land disputes near the dam and Kerala’s parking project. Justices Oka and Bhuyan will finalize the legal issues by mid-July. Tamil Nadu disputed the survey report’s accuracy, demanding its dismissal.
![[Late night Hearing] Tamil Nadu Govt. Fails to Provide Basic Amenities for Ambedkar Birth Anniversary: Madras HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-11.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
On 13th April: In a late-night hearing, the Madras High Court intervened as the Tamil Nadu government failed to provide basic amenities for Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s birth anniversary celebration. Justice Subramaniam personally directed the government to immediately arrange necessary facilities for the public gathering at the memorial in Chennai. The court’s directive emphasized the importance of ensuring a suitable environment for the commemoration.
Today(on 8th April), Tamil Nadu government raised concerns before Madras High Court regarding Election Commission’s ban on school children in political gatherings. Advocate General PS Raman cited PM Modi’s roadshow as reference. The case involves allegations against a school principal under the JJ Act. The court suspended the investigation until the final hearing on April 24.
The Madras High Court has ordered the Tamil Nadu government to expedite criminal case proceedings against MPs and MLAs, with a status report due by June 20. This directive stems from a 2020 Suo motu writ petition and aims to address the backlog of cases, emphasizing the need for efficient legal processes and timely justice.