Supreme Court Says ‘No Urgency’ in Tamil Nadu’s Plea Against Centre Over Withheld Rs.2,151 Crore Education Funds

The Supreme Court of India declined to urgently hear Tamil Nadu’s petition against the Union government for withholding Rs.2,151.59 crore in educational funds. The state alleges the Centre is improperly linking fund release to compliance with the NEP 2020, which it opposes, highlighting the urgent need for funding to ensure educational quality.

Vice-Chancellors Appointments: TN Govt Moves Supreme Court Against Madras HC Stay

The Tamil Nadu government has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Madras High Court’s May 21 order that stayed nine state laws from 2020 related to appointing Vice-Chancellors in universities, calling it unconstitutional interference.

TASMAC Scam: AG Assures Madras High Court FIRs Won’t Be Closed Amid PIL for CBI Probe; Supreme Court Stays ED Investigation

Chennai, May 22, 2025 — The Advocate General (AG) of Tamil Nadu, PS Raman, has assured the Madras High Court that he will advise the State government not to close over 40 FIRs (First Information Reports) related to the TASMAC scam, at least for the time being. This assurance came while the court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a CBI investigation into the alleged Rs.1,000 crore TASMAC scam.

Supreme Court Stays PMLA Probe in TASMAC Case: “ED Crossing All Limits, Acting Unconstitutionally”

Today, On 22nd May, The Supreme Court has stayed the ED’s PMLA probe into the Rs.1,000 crore TASMAC case, stating the agency is “violating the Constitution” and “crossing all limits,” while hearing Tamil Nadu’s challenge to the Madras High Court order.

TASMAC vs ED Case| Madras High Court to Deliver Verdict on April 23

Today, On 21st April, The Madras High Court is set to deliver its verdict on April 23 in the case between TASMAC and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).TASMAC and the Tamil Nadu government had filed petitions challenging the ED raids conducted at the TASMAC head office between March 6 and March 8.

Ex-SC Judge Ajay Rastogi on VP Jagdeep Dhankhar’s Remarks: “I Don’t Believe It’s Judicial Overreach”

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Ajay Rastogi responded to Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s remarks, saying he doesn’t see it as judicial overreach. He stressed that judges act in the interest of public welfare, not in conflict with the executive.

BREAKING | Tamil Nadu Govt Notifies 10 Bills After Supreme Court Verdict: ‘Deemed to Have Been Assented’

Today, On 12th April, In a historic move, the Tamil Nadu Government has notified 10 bills as “deemed to have been assented” by the Governor, following a Supreme Court verdict. The Court criticized the Governor’s undue delay, marking the first time in Indian legislative history that bills take effect without gubernatorial assent but through judicial affirmation.

TASMAC Vs. ED| ‘You’re Going Behind Our Back” Madras High Court Slams Tamil Nadu Govt. for Secretly Approaching Supreme Court

The Madras High Court criticized the Tamil Nadu government for not informing it about a transfer petition to the Supreme Court regarding the TASMAC and ED case. The court expressed disappointment, feeling the State acted unfairly. The ED claims financial irregularities in TASMAC operations involved more than Rs.1,000 crore and sparked political tensions.

BREAKING | Supreme Court Declares Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s Referral of 10 Bills to President as Illegal

Supreme Court Today (April 8) rules Tamil Nadu Governor’s move to send 10 bills to the President as unconstitutional. The court said Governors must act within 3 months and follow the State Government’s advice.

Madras HC Questions ED’s Timing of TASMAC Raids: “State Doesn’t Conduct Searches Late at Night”

Today, On 1st April, During a hearing on the Tamil Nadu government’s plea against the ED’s searches at TASMAC headquarters, the Madras High Court questioned the timing of the raids. Justice S.M. Subramaniam noted that even state agencies conduct searches, but Advocate General P.S. Raman clarified that the state does not conduct late-night raids like the ED. The court raised concerns over officials being prevented from leaving the premises during the searches. The matter continues to be reviewed by the bench.