Today, On 12th April, In a historic move, the Tamil Nadu Government has notified 10 bills as “deemed to have been assented” by the Governor, following a Supreme Court verdict. The Court criticized the Governor’s undue delay, marking the first time in Indian legislative history that bills take effect without gubernatorial assent but through judicial affirmation.
The Madras High Court criticized the Tamil Nadu government for not informing it about a transfer petition to the Supreme Court regarding the TASMAC and ED case. The court expressed disappointment, feeling the State acted unfairly. The ED claims financial irregularities in TASMAC operations involved more than Rs.1,000 crore and sparked political tensions.
Today, On 1st April, During a hearing on the Tamil Nadu government’s plea against the ED’s searches at TASMAC headquarters, the Madras High Court questioned the timing of the raids. Justice S.M. Subramaniam noted that even state agencies conduct searches, but Advocate General P.S. Raman clarified that the state does not conduct late-night raids like the ED. The court raised concerns over officials being prevented from leaving the premises during the searches. The matter continues to be reviewed by the bench.
The Madras High Court expressed confidence that divine blessings will support the development of a metro station, even if temple land is acquired. The judge stated that the metro project would benefit lakhs of people and hoped that God would show kindness toward this public cause. The court emphasized that such infrastructure projects aim to serve the greater good. The statement came amid debates over using religious land for public development.
NEW DELHI: Today, 24th Feb, The Supreme Court of India directed that all First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against YouTuber Savukku Shankar be combined for investigation. However, the investigation in the main FIR, which was registered on May 3, 2024, at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Coimbatore, will continue separately.
Today, On 6th February, A Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan framed key questions in the dispute between the Tamil Nadu government and the Governor over withholding assent to bills. The court is hearing arguments from senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the state. The issue revolves around the Governor’s delay in approving legislation passed by the Assembly. The case highlights ongoing tensions between the state government and the Raj Bhavan.
In the Supreme Court, Tamil Nadu criticized the governor for creating a “constitutional deadlock” with alleged “malice.” The state government accused him of delaying key decisions and obstructing governance. The issue has escalated into a legal battle. The court proceedings highlight growing tensions between state authorities and the governor.
Today, On 30th January, The Supreme Court ordered the formation of a panel led by a retired judge to ensure a clean environment in Vellore. The directive came in response to the illegal discharge of untreated effluents by tanneries into the Palar river in Tamil Nadu. The court emphasized the need for stringent measures to address environmental pollution.