The Supreme Court ruled that prior government approval is a must before prosecuting public servants if their actions are tied to official duties. This protects officers from false or unnecessary criminal cases.
The Supreme Court ruled that Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) can mark appearances only for lawyers who actually appear and argue in a case. The Court emphasized that High Courts and District Courts follow a similar practice, disallowing multiple counsel from marking appearances. This reinforces the need for a structured and consistent approach in court proceedings. The ruling aims to maintain procedural discipline and avoid unnecessary representation.
The Supreme Court directed newly designated Senior Advocates to inform their clients about their senior status. This move aims to ensure transparency and awareness among litigants. The designation comes with added responsibilities and higher fees, making disclosure crucial. The court’s directive reinforces ethical legal practices.
An Advocate-on-Record (AoR) is a specialized lawyer authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court of India, handling case filings, drafting petitions, and ensuring compliance with court procedures. To qualify, AoRs must pass a specialized exam after training. Their role is crucial for effective legal representation and maintaining court integrity.
In a recent development, Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave penned an open letter to Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, voicing his concerns over the reassignment of sensitive cases by the Supreme Court’s Registry. Dave’s letter highlights a pattern of cases, particularly those involving human rights, freedom of speech, democracy, and the functioning of statutory and constitutional institutions, […]