Today, On 19th February, The Supreme Court strongly criticized a lawyer for seeking an adjournment due to a senior advocate’s absence. The bench made it clear that merely naming a senior counsel would not be a valid reason for delaying proceedings. Emphasizing the need to curb this practice, the court asserted that such tendencies among lawyers must stop. The remark highlights the judiciary’s firm stance on ensuring the smooth and timely functioning of cases.
The Supreme Court of India has struck down the electoral bonds scheme, emphasizing the voters’ entitlement to information about electoral candidates. The scheme was found to disproportionately impact this right and failed to be the least restrictive measure in curbing black money. The Court’s decision marks a significant step towards enhancing transparency and equity in political funding.
The Supreme Court declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, annulling the amendments to the Income Tax and Representation of People Act. The scheme’s anonymity violated rights to information and expression. The State Bank of India was instructed to stop issuing electoral bonds, and transparency on donations and recipients was mandated. The decision addressed the unequal impact of corporate and individual contributions.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, has declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, invalidating anonymous political party donations. The Court cited violations of the right to information and free speech, mandating disclosure of bond recipients and refunding unused bonds. The scheme, introduced in 2018, aimed for transparency but faced criticism for fostering corruption and favoritism.