Today, On 8th May, The SCBA Election Committee has announced that candidates contesting in SCBA Election 2025 will receive a refund of their security deposit only if they secure 20% or more of the total valid votes polled.
The Justice L Nageswara Rao committee has invited lawyers to provide inputs on reforms in the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) elections. SCBA members have been asked to share their views on changes to eligibility, tenure, and voting norms. The initiative aims to enhance transparency and efficiency in the election process. Suggestions from legal professionals will play a key role in shaping the reforms.
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) have approached the Supreme Court with a request. They seek a direction to ensure that the names of all lawyers present and appearing in a case are officially recorded. This move aims to give due recognition to all advocates contributing to cases. The matter is now before the top court for consideration.
The Supreme Court of India has revised its scheduling procedure, announcing that from January 2025, regular hearing matters will be conducted on Thursdays instead of Wednesdays and Thursdays. This change aims to enhance court efficiency. Additionally, miscellaneous matters, such as bail pleas, will be heard on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays.
Today, On 6th December, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition against lawyers affiliated with political parties participating in Bar Council elections, asserting that political beliefs do not disqualify their involvement. The Court emphasized the independence of bar associations and allowed individuals to hold office despite political ideologies, highlighting the need for balancing responsibilities and beliefs.
At a farewell event for Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Attorney General R. Venkatramani praised his scholarly qualities, commitment to justice, and impactful tenure. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal highlighted Chandrachud’s openness to critical issues, emphasizing that his legacy would endure due to his thoughtful and inclusive approaches to leadership.
Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud underscored the importance of independence among the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary for national improvement. He addressed concerns over Prime Minister Modi’s recent visit to his home during a festival, asserting that such social interactions do not affect judicial impartiality and emphasizing the judiciary’s distinct role in governance.
Today, On 30th August, Kapil Sibal urged the Chief Justice of India to appoint more women to the higher judiciary, emphasizing the need for gender representation. With only two women judges in the Supreme Court, Sibal highlighted the potential of women in the legal profession and emphasized the challenges they face in rising to leadership positions. Justice Hima Kohli’s distinguished career was also praised.
![[RG Kar Rape] "SCBA President & MP Calling Violence Against Women a 'Symptomatic Malaise'. What a shame!": Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar Criticizes Kapil Sibal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/shared-image-4-2.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 30th August, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar condemned Kapil Sibal’s description of violence against women as a “symptomatic malaise,” criticizing the trivialization of their suffering. The controversial remarks were made in the context of the rape and murder of a junior doctor in Kolkata. The incident has sparked national outrage and calls for fundamental workplace reforms.
![[RG Kar Rape & Murder Case] "This is a Blatant Breach of Trust, Presenting a Unilateral Statement as an SCBA resolution Without EC Approval ": Senior Advocate Adish Aggarwala Threatens 'No Confidence Motion' Against SCBA President Kapil Sibal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-32-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Adish Aggarwala cautioned SCBA President Kapil Sibal about a potential no-confidence motion due to a controversial resolution regarding the RG Kar incident. He accused Sibal of a conflict of interest and demanded a public apology and withdrawal of the resolution. The Supreme Court also voiced concerns about the case and the handling by West Bengal police.