The Orissa High Court will remain closed for summer vacation, but arrangements have been made to hear urgent matters on specific dates. A dedicated bench will be available to handle critical cases during this period.
The Supreme Court of India has announced a change to its summer break, now termed “partial court working days,” from May 26 to July 13. This year, there will be two to five vacation benches, including senior judges, allowing for ongoing hearings. The court’s administrative wing will operate from 10 am to 5 pm, closing on weekends and holidays.
Today(on 5th August), Chief Justice DY Chandrachud announced that 21 Supreme Court benches operated during the summer break from May 20 to July 7. These benches addressed 4,000 listed matters, with 1,160 cases being resolved. The figures highlight the court’s productivity during the vacation period.
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) on Friday (June 21st) urged Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to recall the recent decision to list service and labour matters before the vacation benches of the Court from June 25.
Today(on 6th June), during the High Court’s summer vacation, a Division Bench will address a counter-PIL questioning Justice Singh’s impartiality in police cases. The litigant’s concerns highlight doubts over Justice Singh’s ability to judge such cases fairly, escalating the dispute.
The Supreme Court Yesterday (May 21st) questioned the rationale behind the listing of transfer petitions before vacation benches of the top court.
The Supreme Court of India has announced the 2024 summer vacation bench schedule, from May 20 to July 7, with 20 benches nominated by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud. These benches are vital for maintaining judicial continuity during the break. Judges utilize this time for essential tasks, dispelling the misconception of a leisurely vacation for the judiciary.
Today (16th April): The Supreme Court urged a comprehensive approach to addressing mob lynching, cautioning against selective focus on specific incidents. The PIL raised concerns about rising violence against minorities, particularly victims of cow vigilante attacks, and emphasized the need for urgent financial support for affected families. The Court directed states to respond within six weeks regarding action taken in such cases.
