The Supreme Court of India has ruled that an adequately explained delay in recording witness statements does not automatically benefit the accused in a criminal trial.
The Delhi High Court Today dismissed a petition seeking action against Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav, and Arvind Kejriwal for allegedly making false statements against the government. The court emphasized the electorate’s discernment, stating that individuals are capable of distinguishing truth from falsehood and can take their own action. The petition raised concerns about the impact of these statements on India’s image and the government’s credibility.
The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday (March 6th) that collaboration with an investigation does not require self-incriminating statements, overturning a decision denying bail to a petitioner accused of inflating construction costs. The Court emphasized that participation in the investigation does not imply confession. The accused was granted bail, with instructions to cooperate with the ongoing investigation.