BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | Governors Must Handle Bills As Soon as Possible, Not As Convenient: Kerala Tells Supreme Court

Today, on 9th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Kerala told the Supreme Court that Governors must handle legislative Bills “as soon as possible, not as convenient.” Senior Advocate K.K. Venugopal emphasized timely gubernatorial action under Article 200.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | Discretionary Powers of Governor Are Constitutionally Limited: Karnataka Tells Supreme Court”

Today, on 9th September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Karnataka told the Supreme Court that discretionary powers of Governors are constitutionally limited, stressing that ultimate sovereignty lies with the people and governance in a parliamentary democracy functions only through Cabinet responsibility and legislative supremacy.

Assent To Bills | Day 8 | Union Government Was Attempting to Abrogate the Core of Constitution: Karnataka, West Bengal & Himachal Tell Supreme Court

Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.

Presidential Reference| “Governor Blocking Bills Makes Constitution Unworkable”: West Bengal Tells Supreme Court

Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Kapil Sibal representing state of West Bengal tells Supreme Court, “Governor blocking bills makes Constitution unworkable.” The state emphasized that such discretionary powers of the Governor undermine the cabinet form of government and the principles of collective responsibility enshrined in the Constitution.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Has Only Executive Power, No Legislative Powers: Karnataka Tells Supreme Court

Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Karnataka tells Supreme Court that the Governor has only executive power and no legislative powers. Senior Advocate Gopal Subramaniam emphasized that any discretion of the Governor is clearly defined in the Constitution.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Can’t Be a Postman or a Super Legislature: Supreme Court

Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, The Supreme Court said that a Governor cannot just act like a postman or behave like a super legislature while examining the constitutional limits of a Governor’s powers under Article 200.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row| Governor Can’t Examine Legislative Competence of Bills: Kapil Sibal to Supreme Court

Today, On 3rd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, Kapil Sibal told the Supreme Court that a Governor cannot examine the legislative competence of Bills, stressing that any discretion must strictly come from the Constitution and not through arbitrary delays that undermine state legislatures.

Assent To Bills | Day 7 | “What if Governor Does Not Follow the Timeline?”: Supreme Court on Presidential Reference Hearing

Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | “Executive Has No Legislative Power, Governor Cannot Withhold Bills”: Kapil Sibal Tells Supreme Court

Today, on 2nd September, in the Presidential Reference Row, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing West Bengal, said that the legislature’s sovereign acts cannot be implemented by the Executive. The Governor cannot withhold bills, and at no stage does the Executive possess legislative authority.

BREAKING | Presidential Reference Row | “Not Going To Decide On Basis Of Which Political Dispensation Is In Power Or Was In Power”: CJI Gavai

Today, On 2nd September, In the Presidential Reference hearing, CJI Gavai clarified that the Supreme Court will not decide the matter based on which political dispensation is in power or was in power, stressing focus only on constitutional interpretation.