The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitions from Ola and Uber challenging the 5% service charge cap for app-based autorickshaws. The ruling supports consumer protection and fair pricing, providing significant relief to Bengaluru commuters. The court emphasized the government’s authority in regulating these services, leading to the dismissal of the petitions.
![[Defamation Case] Rahul Gandhi Ordered to Attend Bengaluru Court on June 7](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-25.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Rahul Gandhi, Congress leader, faces a defamation case by BJP in Bengaluru court, with CM and deputy granted bail. The case alleges false claims in political ads. Gandhi missed a hearing, citing prior commitments. Congress defends its campaign against alleged corruption, while BJP accuses defamation. Court directs Gandhi to appear on June 7.
Today, On 21st May, Hotels and bar owners in Mumbai challenge the ‘dry day’ on the day of poll results, stating it harms their business and is unnecessary after voting. The Bombay High Court will consider the plea, which seeks relaxation of the alcohol sales ban during this period due to economic concerns for the hospitality industry.
Today, 26th April, The Supreme Court instructed the Gujarat High Court Registry to provide a response regarding the promotion of judicial officers to Additional District Judges. This directive follows a legal petition seeking clarity and transparency in the promotion process. The case highlights the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal guidelines in judicial appointments. The Supreme Court’s involvement highlights its role in upholding the integrity of the judiciary.
On Thursday (4th March): The Madras High Court questioned the Coimbatore Police’s decision to file a criminal case against a school for its students attending Prime Minister Modi’s roadshow in their uniforms. The court requested an explanation for initiating the case and extended protection to the school management until April 8. This action prompted concerns and judicial scrutiny.
The Karnataka High Court summoned Rahul Gandhi, Siddaramaiah, and others following Congress’ claim of a “40% commission” scheme by the previous BJP administration. Allegations led to a special court appearance on March 28th. The court instructed the state government to conclude its investigation within six weeks. Union Minister Pralhad Joshi accused the Congress government of taking 50%.
!["National Wealth Redistribution Proposal is 'Juvenile'": SG | 9-Judge Bench | Nature of Private Property [Day 4]](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-106.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
New Delhi, January 16: Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in a significant observation, highlighted the pressing issue of mediocrity within the district judiciary. During a hearing on Tuesday, January16, he emphasized the urgent need for implementing effective measures to ensure the recruitment of competent individuals in the judiciary. This statement came in the backdrop […]
