The Karnataka High Court questioned the trial court’s decision to grant bail to Janata Dal (Secular) leader HD Revanna in a kidnapping case. The court noted potential errors in the legal interpretation used and issued a notice to HD Revanna. The case involves serious allegations of sexual abuse, kidnapping, and leaked pornographic videos. The High Court has scheduled a priority hearing to address these severe allegations, emphasizing the urgency of the matter.
Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.
Today, 24th April,Umar Khalid’s lawyer argued in court that the allegations against him do not amount to a terrorism offense, emphasizing the lack of evidence. The defense also highlighted media scrutiny and called for a fair legal process. Khalid’s bail request is under consideration, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7. The lawyer cited inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and urged the court to assess the evidence critically.
Today, 16th April,Delhi court directs ED to respond to Arvind Kejriwal’s plea for medical consultation via video conference. Kejriwal’s counsel cited low blood sugar levels as reason for request. ED argues medical facilities are available in jail. Kejriwal is in judicial custody until April 23 in money laundering case related to liquor policy. Delhi Court dismissed his plea against arrest by ED. Kejriwal claims innocence in money laundering case.
![[Breaking] Delhi HC's Justice Amit Sharma Recuses from Umar Khalid's Bail Plea in Delhi Riots Case; Will Hear on July 24](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/14khalid.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
On Tuesday (9th April): The Delhi Police opposed Umar Khalid’s bail plea, alleging he spread false information on social media and incited violence during the 2020 Delhi riots. They presented evidence of his communication with various individuals to manipulate the narrative. Khalid’s request for bail hinged on lack of evidence against him, with the court set to decide on the matter.
The Karnataka High Court has overturned the government’s decision to assign regular Public Prosecutors to Special Courts under the POCSO Act, stating that Special Public Prosecutors under the Act are restricted to handling only assigned cases. The ruling emphasizes the importance of strict adherence to legal procedures and the need for specialized legal expertise in handling sensitive cases.
In a recent development concerning the Northeast Delhi riots case, a Delhi court expressed its dismay over the aggressive behavior of the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP). The court highlighted an incident where the SPP, instead of acknowledging his error, began to raise his voice against the court and even went to the extent of throwing […]