Today, On 30th April, The Supreme Court has stayed the Delhi High Court’s direction to revise the CLAT-UG 2025 merit list. This interim order was passed while issuing notice on a Special Leave Petition challenging the April 23 order.
The Supreme Court has directed the Manipur High Court to resolve whether expired gram panchayat members can stay in office when an administrator is appointed. A three-month deadline was set for this decision amid concerns over ongoing violence preventing elections. The legality of these elected positions hinges on amendments to the Manipur Panchayati Raj Act.
The Supreme Court allowed the declaration of results for undergraduate AYUSH students who were admitted without taking the NEET UG-2019 exam. However, the court maintained that their admissions were irregular and did not comply with required norms. Despite this, the students will be able to receive their results. The ruling balances adherence to regulations with considerations for students’ futures.
NEW DELHI: J Deepa, the niece of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa, has approached the Supreme Court, asking for the return of her late aunt’s confiscated properties. She has filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Karnataka High Court order that refused to release Jayalalithaa’s assets to her.
Today, On 3rd February, A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar dismissed the appeal against the Karnataka High Court’s decision to quash the FIR filed against Nalin Kateel. After reviewing the complaint, the Bench found it to be “full of assumptions.” The Court emphasized that there was no sufficient basis to continue with the FIR. The ruling marks a significant development in the legal proceedings involving Kateel.
The BRS opposition party has petitioned the Supreme Court for the disqualification of ten MLAs who defected to the Congress, after the Legislative Assembly Speaker took no action for nine months on previous petitions. They reference a High Court ruling that mandated timely resolution of disqualification claims against the defectors.
The Supreme Court ruled that the police acted “completely illegal” by filing a charge-sheet against an individual contrary to a court order prohibiting coercive action. Although it dismissed contempt notices against the officers involved after accepting their apologies, it warned that future violations could lead to contempt proceedings and mandated a review of police directives.
Today, On 4th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition contesting two NEET-UG exam questions, emphasizing the need for stability in the examination process. The court upheld the Delhi High Court’s decision, rejecting claims of arbitrariness, and stated that altering results would disrupt admissions. Legal avenues remain open for addressing individual grievances.