![[Odisha Mining Cess Dispute] 9-Judge Bench Reserves Verdict| Disagreement Between Odisha & Centre on Supreme Court's Ruling](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-36-3.png?resize=447%2C350&ssl=1)
Today, On 31st July, The Odisha and Central governments are in disagreement over the Supreme Court’s recent judgment on states’ authority to levy a mining cess. The court is now deliberating on whether the judgment should apply retrospectively or prospectively. This disagreement has caused significant consternation, with both sides presenting their arguments. The judgement is awaited.
![[Forest Fires in Uttarakhand] "Before The Next Season, You Must Put Everything in Place": SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shared-image.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd July, The Supreme Court mandated that all necessary steps be taken to prevent forest fires in Uttarakhand before the upcoming season. This directive emphasizes the urgency and importance of proactive measures to protect the region’s forests. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday emphasized the need for authorities to prepare measures to […]
![[NEET-PG 2024] SC Seeks NBE's Response on Aspirants Plea Seeking Transparency & Disclosure of Answer Keys](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-18T155323.705.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 18th July, The Supreme Court of India currently hearing 40 pleas to cancel the NEET UG 2024 exam. Chief Justice Chandrachud emphasized the need to prove the leak’s widespread impact on the entire exam for its cancellation. Key questions raised include the number of affected seats, students, and the fairness of the examination process. Over 23 lakh medical aspirants’ future hinges on the Supreme Court’s judgment.
Today(on 6th July), The CBI’s investigation into the excise policy case has now shifted its focus solely to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. This comes after the completion of the probe on all other accused individuals. The ongoing scrutiny of Kejriwal’s role, as well as allegations of misrepresentation by the CBI, indicate the complexity and seriousness of the case.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta showcased India’s historical arbitration expertise and emphasized the nation’s potential in arbitration. He aimed to position India as a global arbitration center, highlighting the government’s commitment. This move seeks to attract international arbitration cases, modernize India’s arbitration landscape, and enhance its reputation. The inclusive nature of the Arbitration Bar was also underscored.
Today (6th May): The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Chandrachud, has halted land clearance for the proposed Silchar Greenfield Airport. The Court found that authorities violated the 2006 EIA notification by conducting extensive clearance without proper environmental clearance. The NGT was criticized for dismissing the plea without verification, and the Court directed no further action until an EIA report is available.
Today(on 24th April), The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing on West Bengal’s lawsuit against CBI to May 1, granting more time for arguments. The lawsuit alleges that CBI conducted investigations without state consent. This postponement allows both parties to present their arguments, with significant implications for CBI’s jurisdictional authority and state government independence in law enforcement.
Today (22nd March) The Supreme Court set guidelines for Lokayukta appointments, emphasizing the need for meaningful consultation with opposition leaders. This follows a plea contesting the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta’s appointment without Leader of the Opposition consultation. The court aims to ensure transparency and statutory compliance in such appointments nationwide. The plea challenges the appointment’s transparency and demands its annulment.
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has recently addressed the contentious issue of one three-judge bench scrutinizing the verdict of another bench of the same strength. This move, which has been met with objections from the Centre, follows a precedent set by the Court’s earlier interpretation of land acquisition law. Also read- […]
