Munambam Waqf Land Grab Row: Supreme Court Grants Three-Week Extension In Challenge To Kerala High Court Order

Today, On 30th January, Munambam Waqf land dispute reached the Supreme Court, which granted a three-week extension for filing a counter affidavit in the SLP challenging the Kerala High Court’s order calling the Waqf Board’s 404-acre land notification a “land-grabbing tactic” move.

ANALYSIS | “This Generation Don’t Want to Go to the Trial Court to Learn the Practice”: Supreme Court Slams Lawyer & Grants Parole to Accused for Wife’s Surgery

Parole granted on humanitarian grounds to enable the convict to support his ailing wife and minor children. Supreme Court emphesised that the junior lawyers must thoroughly know the case before appearing and learn legal practice at trial court level.

Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant Slams AOR || ‘Did You Even Qualify?’: Lawyer Rapped for Calling Minor’s Rape ‘Consensual’

Today, On 20th March, During a bail plea hearing, Justice Surya Kant reprimanded the counsel for repeatedly referring to a minor’s case as a “consensual relationship” in the Special Leave Petition (SLP). The judge questioned the counsel’s legal understanding, emphasizing that a minor cannot legally consent. Expressing frustration, he remarked, “Are you the Advocate on Record who qualified the exam? If so, then something is wrong with the committee,we will investigate it.” The exchange highlights concerns over legal competence in sensitive cases involving minors.

Just Because There Is No Bar, Doesn’t Mean There Is No Limit || SC on AoRs Appearances

The Supreme Court ruled that Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) can mark appearances only for lawyers who actually appear and argue in a case. The Court emphasized that High Courts and District Courts follow a similar practice, disallowing multiple counsel from marking appearances. This reinforces the need for a structured and consistent approach in court proceedings. The ruling aims to maintain procedural discipline and avoid unnecessary representation.

BCI Chairman’s Rajya Sabha Membership | Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Manan Kumar Mishra

Today, On 16th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging Manan Kumar Mishra’s membership in the Rajya Sabha, where he serves as the Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI). The petition sought to disqualify Mishra, but the Court found no merit in the challenge and upheld his position. The decision reinforces Mishra’s eligibility to hold the seat in Parliament. The Court ruled in favor of dismissing the plea.

Protesting Farmers to Meet Justice Nawab Singh Committee Today For Negotiations: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India adjourned the farmers’ protest hearing until January 10, 2025, pending a report from a committee meeting with protesting farmers. Concerns regarding the health of leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal, who is on a hunger strike, remain critical, with calls for medical intervention amid ongoing negotiations.

Renukaswamy Murder | ‘Police Would Would Recommend an Appeal to the Govt. to Revoke the Bail’: Karnataka to Challenge Actor Darshan’s Bail in Supreme Court

The Karnataka government plans to challenge the High Court’s decision to grant bail to actor Darshan in the Renukaswamy murder case. Senior advocates are preparing to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court within three days, seeking to overturn the bail order. This move comes in light of concerns over the court’s ruling and aims to get the decision reviewed at the highest judicial forum.

 ‘Ayogya’ Remark on Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge|| SC Stays Further Investigation on Karnataka FIR Against Man

The Supreme Court temporarily stayed the investigation into an FIR against a man who called Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge “ayogya” (incompetent). This follows a challenge to the Karnataka High Court’s ruling, which upheld charges under specific IPC sections for inciting violence and promoting enmity, while dismissing those under the SC/ST Act.

[UPNL Employees Case] Major Defeat to Uttarakhand Govt. as SC Dismissed SLP

The Uttarakhand government faced a legal loss in the Supreme Court over UPNL employees, as the court dismissed its Special Leave Petition, upholding a 2018 High Court ruling for “equal pay for equal work.” This decision impacts around 25,000 UPNL employees, reigniting hopes for fair wages and employment regulation.

“Don’t Argue in Hindi, Court’s official Language is English”: SC Slams Petitioner

The Supreme Court of India reinforced the use of English as the official language for court proceedings, raising concerns about the growing use of Hindi. This has sparked debates about language inclusivity in the legal system. The bench made it clear that all proceedings must be conducted in English unless specified otherwise by Parliament, with the Chief Justice also advocating for the use of regional languages to enhance justice delivery.