Out of 221 names suggested for High Court judges since November 2022, 29 are still waiting for the Centre’s approval. SC/ST got only 4% posts, while minorities got 14%, showing a big gap.
The Delhi High Court tribunal upheld the five-year extension of the ban on Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), citing its continued subversive activities. The group, founded by Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, issued threats to top Indian officials and attempted to incite violence. Authorities highlighted SFJ’s use of social media to spread separatist propaganda. The extension aims to stop its influence and maintain national security.
Today, On 6th January, The Supreme Court has scheduled the hearing of Sajjan Kumar’s appeal in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case for July. The court clarified that if the final hearing faces delays, it will consider suspending his sentence. Kumar, a former Congress leader, was convicted in 2018 for his role in the riots. The case remains one of the most significant legal battles linked to the tragic events of 1984.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, has paused new lawsuits while reviewing challenges to the Places of Worship Act. Advocate Hari Shankar Jain advocates restoring demolished Hindu temples, claiming the ruling benefits Hindus. The court will evaluate ongoing cases concerning religious structures in due course.
Today, On 12th December, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna will hear petitions contesting the Places of Worship Act, which preserves the status of religious sites as of August 15, 1947. Supporters argue it upholds secularism and prevents communal tensions, while challengers claim it violates religious rights and impedes judicial remedies for various faiths.
Yesterday, On 28th November, A Varanasi court dismissed a plea against Rahul Gandhi for his comments about Sikhs made during a US visit, alleging insecurity among them in India. The court found no basis for legal action, citing a lack of specificity regarding offenses, despite claims that Gandhi’s remarks could incite fear among Sikhs.
![[1984 anti-Sikh riots case] "Kill the Sikhs, They Have Killed Our Mother": Jagdish Tytler Moves Delhi HC to Stay Trial in Anti-Sikh Riots Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/tytlerpti-1243724-1691166034-jpg-1200%C3%97675-11-11-2024_01_44_PM.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Congress leader Jagdish Tytler has sought a stay on trial proceedings regarding his alleged role in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. His legal team argues that proceeding with the trial is premature as they contest murder charges and allege a flawed investigation by the CBI. Tytler claims innocence and cites his health issues in challenging the trial court’s decisions.
Today, On 25th October, The Supreme Court postponed a hearing on a PIL opposing ‘VIP entry charges’ in Indian temples, emphasizing a detailed review of the fees’ effects on worship access. The petition claims these charges violate equality and dignity rights, urging equal treatment for all devotees regardless of financial status and the need for standardized temple access procedures.
A lawyer filed a complaint against Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of making controversial remarks about Sikhs during a visit to the US. The lawyer claims Gandhi’s comments have hurt the sentiments of the Sikh community. The complaint has been submitted to the Home Minister, Delhi Police, and NIA, urging them to take action, claiming Gandhi’s intent to provoke communal hatred and disrupt the Indian government.
The Central Government established an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal led by Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, a Delhi High Court Judge, to determine if there’s enough cause to continue classifying ‘Sikhs for Justice (SFJ)’ as an unlawful association. The Ministry of Home Affairs extended SFJ’s designation for another five years starting July 10, 2024.
