![[MARITAL RAPE CRIMINALIZATION] 'Not a Case of Men vs Women. But People vs Patriarchy': Next SC Hearing On Tuesday (Oct 22)](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-27-1.png?resize=447%2C270&ssl=1)
Today, On 17th October, Senior Advocate Karuna Nundy argued in the Supreme Court for the criminalization of marital rape, challenging the validity of IPC Section 375’s exception. The Central government opposes this change, citing existing protections and concerns over marital dynamics. A crucial hearing will occur on October 22, with significant legal implications.
In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court held that engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child constitutes sexual harassment of a minor. Justice A. Badharudeen made this observation while hearing a plea from a man seeking to quash charges against him under various sections of the IPC, the POCSO Act, and the Juvenile Justice Act. The court emphasized that such behavior amounts to sexual harassment, reinforcing the need for stringent action to protect minors from exposure to sexual acts.
Himachal Pradesh High Court granted bail to a man accused of deceiving a transgender person with false marriage promises. It ruled that Section 69 of the BNS applies only to women, not transgender individuals. The accused may still face charges under Section 18(d) of the Transgender Persons Act for abuse, and the case will be decided in the lower court.
Today, On 9th July, The Supreme Court highlighted public unawareness of the increased age of consent for sexual intercourse, now raised to 18 years from 16. Challenges in enforcing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act were noted, particularly in cases of consensual relationships involving young girls. This lack of awareness necessitates focused educational initiatives to address the issue.