Supreme Court: “Law Must Be Laid Down, Courts Can’t Recall Orders Without Hearing Parties or Giving Reasons”

The Supreme Court emphasized the need for a clear legal framework to prevent courts from recalling orders without hearing the parties involved. It stated that such actions must adhere to the principles of natural justice. Courts are also obligated to provide valid reasons when deciding to withdraw an order. The ruling aims to enhance transparency and accountability in judicial processes.

CJI Chandrachud Retirement | ‘Transformative Yet Unfulfilled’: Senior Lawyers On Chief Justice Chandrachud’s Tenure

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s farewell ceremony highlighted his transformative legacy, emphasizing his judicial reforms and embrace of technology. His tenure, marked by progressive rulings on civil liberties like same-sex marriage and privacy, left a significant impact on Indian jurisprudence. Legal peers lauded his approach, while some noted missed opportunities on critical issues.

Legal Notice Forgery| Delhi Court Rejects Bail to Accused of Using Fake Signature of Sidharth Luthra

A Delhi court denied bail to Mohit Goyal for allegedly forging the signature of lawyer Sidharth Luthra in a legal notice sent to IndusInd Bank. The judge emphasized Goyal’s history of similar offenses and the societal interest in denying bail. Goyal’s arrest followed a complaint by Luthra, and the case has sparked discussions on preventing such incidents.

[Empowering Junior Lawyers] SC Stresses Significance of Junior Lawyers in Vacation Bench Arguments

Today, On 20th May, The Supreme Court emphasized the need for junior lawyers to argue before vacation benches. This allows them to gain experience and advance professionally. The Court urged senior lawyers to support this initiative, highlighting the importance of providing opportunities for young legal professionals. Emphasis was also placed on the role of senior lawyers in mentoring and training junior members of the legal profession.

Bilkis case: Are the convicts getting preferential treatment?

Bilkis Bano Case: Supreme Court Deliberates on Preferential Treatment of Convicts The Supreme Court, led by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, is critically examining the Gujarat government’s decision to grant remission to 11 convicts from the Bilkis Bano case. These individuals had been sentenced to life imprisonment due to their involvement in the violent […]

Respect PIL Guidelines: Frivolous Petitions Drain Valuable Judicial Resources – Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has recently expressed its concerns over the potential misuse of Public Interest Litigations (PILs), emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the judicial system from unnecessary burdens. The Division Bench, consisting of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, highlighted the need for vigilance to ensure that the liberal framework surrounding […]

DVAC Ask Judge to Step Back from Minister’s Acquittal Review

In a recent development, the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) has raised concerns over the Madras High Court’s decision to take up a suo motu revision of the acquittal of Minister K. Ponmudi. Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, representing the DVAC, questioned the propriety of Justice Venkatesh’s order, which was passed without issuing notice to […]

Supreme Court Questions Bilkis Bano Case Convicts on Fine Payment Delay

Supreme Court Probes Delay in Fine Payment by Convicts in Bilkis Bano Case In a recent development concerning the Bilkis Bano gangrape case, the Supreme Court has sought clarification from the 11 convicts who were released on remission. The apex court questioned if their alleged delay in depositing the fines, which were part of their […]