MUDA Scam | Karnataka High Court Adjourns CM Siddaramaiah’s Appeal Against Governor’s Probe Sanction to November Second Week

Today, On 4th September, In The MUDA scam case the Karnataka High Court postponed CM Siddaramaiah’s appeal against Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot’s approval for probe, fixing the final hearing in the second week of November amid growing political tension.

MUDA Scam | Special Court Reserves Order Until April 15 on ED’s Objection to Closure Report Involving CM Siddaramaiah

Today, On 9th April, A special court reserved its order until April 15 on the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) objection to a closure report filed in a case allegedly involving the Chief Minister. The ED opposed the closure, citing unresolved issues and pending evidence. The court heard detailed arguments from both sides. The final decision is now expected next week.

MUDA Scam || “Details Shared, Not Included”: ED Challenges Lokayukta’s B Report in Special Court

Today, On 8th April, In the MUDA scam case, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has opposed the ‘B report’ submitted by the Lokayukta police in the Special Court. The ED says that important information it gave was not included in the report. It has asked the court to review the report and allow more investigation. The case is about suspected wrongdoing in land allotments by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA).

MUDA Scam || Karnataka HC Rejects Plea to Transfer Probe Against CM Siddaramaiah to CBI

Today, On 7th February, The Karnataka High Court rejected a petition seeking to transfer the MUDA scam investigation against Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to the CBI. The plea was filed by activist Snehmayi Krishna, the original complainant in the case. Justice M Nagaprasanna, a single-judge bench, dismissed the request, stating that no grounds warranted a CBI probe. The decision upholds the ongoing investigation by state authorities.

CJI Khanna Seeks ECI Response On Plea Against Increase Of Voters Per Polling Booth To 1,500

The Supreme Court On Monday (2nd Dec), directed the Election Commission of India to file an affidavit regarding its decision to increase the number of voters per polling booth to 1,500. Concerns about voter efficiency and convenience were raised during the proceedings, and the Court emphasized that no voter should face inconvenience due to this change.

Rs 50 Lakh & Apology: Why Delhi HC Orders TMC MP Saket Gokhale in Defamation Case?

The Delhi High Court directed TMC MP Saket Gokhale to pay Rs 50 lakh in damages to former diplomat Lakshmi Puri for a defamation case. Gokhale was also mandated to publish an apology in The Times of India and on his X handle within eight weeks. The court’s order followed allegations of defamatory tweets made by Gokhale against Puri.

Supreme Court Rules: Food Safety and Standards Act Overrides IPC in Adulteration Cases

The appellant contested the decision made by the Allahabad High Court, which dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) aimed at nullifying the prosecution for violations under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC. In 2010, the Uttar Pradesh State authorized authorities to commence prosecutions under these IPC provisions […]

Delhi High Court Reserves Judgment in Defamation Suit Filed by Chief Secretary Against ‘The Wire’

The Delhi High Court has reserved judgment on the interim relief plea in the defamation suit filed by Delhi’s Chief Secretary Naresh Kumar against the news portal ‘The Wire’. The suit concerns a report that cast aspersions on Kumar in relation to his alleged involvement in a land acquisition case for the Dwarka Expressway project. […]