Trademark Registry Withdraws Approval for ‘CHUTIYARAM’ Mark Due to Legal Issues

The Trade Marks Registry has withdrawn its approval for registering the trademark ‘CHUTIYARAM’ under Class 30 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The decision came on Tuesday, just a day after the mark was published in the Trademark Journal and two weeks after it was initially accepted. In an official order published on Tuesday, the Trade Marks Registry admitted that the acceptance of the application was a mistake and that the mark violated legal provisions under Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Patna High Court: “Father-in-law Not Liable to Pay Maintenance to His Widowed Daughter-in-law”

Patna: The Patna High Court ruled that a father-in-law is not automatically required to provide maintenance to his widowed daughter-in-law under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA). The court stated that such liability arises only if the father-in-law has sufficient income from coparcenary property. The case originated from a Criminal Revision petition filed by a widowed woman seeking financial support from her late husband’s family.

BREAKING |PMLA Case | SC Adjourns Hearing on AAP MLA Jaswant Singh Gajjan Majra’s Arrest Challenge to June 18

Today(on 10th June),The Supreme Court adjourned the hearing on Punjab AAP MLA Jaswant Singh Gajjan Majra’s plea challenging his arrest and remand by the Enforcement Directorate to June 18, citing the absence of a rejoinder and highlighting similarities to the Arvind Kejriwal case.

[BREAKING] Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on Arvind Kejriwal’s Arrest in Delhi Excise Policy Case

The Supreme Court of India reserved its verdict today on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s petition challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case. The bench reviewed the case papers and requested the ED to present any new evidence justifying Kejriwal’s arrest. Kejriwal retains the interim liberty to apply for bail.

Supreme Court: ED Required Special Court Permission to Arrest PMLA Accused

Today (16th May): The Supreme Court ruled that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) needs special court permission to arrest individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) if they respond to court summons. The court clarified that if an accused appears in response to a summons, the agency must apply to the court for custody. This decision impacts the procedures for arrest and bail under the PMLA.