Today, On 8th August, In the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, Chief Justice Gavai has agreed to an early hearing of advocate Surendra Gadling’s bail plea. The Supreme Court aims to expedite the process after repeated adjournments.
The Supreme Court of India clarified distinctions between copyright and design protection in an important ruling, introducing a two-step test for courts. The judgment addresses when artistic works lose copyright protection due to industrial use, emphasizing the need for case-specific inquiries. It aims to harmonize the intentions of the Copyright and Designs Acts.
![[Elgar Parishad-Maoist Links Case] Supreme Court Seeks NIA's Stand on Interim Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-11-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 14th June, In the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, the Supreme Court questioned the NIA about an activist’s plea for interim bail to attend rituals following his grandmother’s death. The activist faces charges related to alleged Maoist links and seeks temporary relief due to health and humanitarian concerns. The court’s action reflects the broader debate on civil rights and national security.
In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court granted bail to Gautam Navlakha, a senior journalist and activist, in the Bhima Koregaon – Elgar Parishad riots case. The court, comprising Justices AS Gadkari and Shivkumar Dige, found no substantial evidence to suggest Navlakha’s involvement in a terrorist act as defined under Section 15 of the […]
