The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) have approached the Supreme Court with a request. They seek a direction to ensure that the names of all lawyers present and appearing in a case are officially recorded. This move aims to give due recognition to all advocates contributing to cases. The matter is now before the top court for consideration.
The Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA) has requested revised guidelines for adjournment letters from Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Citing procedural delays and operational inefficiencies due to recent modifications, SCAORA seeks formalization of acceptable circumstances for adjournments, aiming to enhance judicial efficiency and respect advocates’ logistical realities in India’s legal system.
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) raised concerns in a letter to Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna regarding recent architectural changes at the Supreme Court. They criticized the lack of consultation over glass partitions and the relocation of the National Judicial Museum, fearing these actions could undermine institutional heritage and inclusivity in decision-making.
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) penned a detailed letter on November 29 addressing the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna raising critical concerns regarding the current practices of issuing hearing sequences and granting passovers. This letter sheds light on the operational challenges faced by advocates, clerks, and other stakeholders in the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court Today (Nov 25) made it clear that lawyers engaging in fraudulent practices will face strict action from Court. The Court made the observation while turning down the pleas filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) to modify the Court’s earlier order directing a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe after a fake appeal was filed before it. The Bench asserted that regardless of who the individual is, they will be punished for committing fraud on the Court.
![[SCAORA Notification]"An Urgent Inquiry Is Needed”: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association Demands Investigation into Ghaziabad Court Incident](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/supreme-court-4.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) has called for an urgent investigation into the October 29 incident at Ghaziabad court, where advocates faced a lathi charge. Emphasizing judicial integrity, SCAORA urges a fair inquiry led by the Allahabad High Court’s Chief Justice. SCAORA’s statement, issued by Honorary Secretary Nikhil Jain, supports the injured and seeks accountability.
The Supreme Court plans to establish guidelines for Advocates-on-Record (AORs) due to concerns over conduct and false statements in a criminal case involving a 30-year sentence. AORs are crucial for litigants, and the Court seeks input from the Supreme Court AOR Association to ensure proper guidelines are formulated.
Supreme Court Justice Sanjay Karol shared a photo of a menstruating woman barred from her home, illustrating enduring menstrual taboos in India. He emphasized the need for awareness and change in women’s rights, calling for greater access to justice for those in rural areas and highlighting the Constitution’s role in promoting social and economic justice.
Today, On 19th October, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the Supreme Court’s role as a people’s court, emphasizing judicial independence and the need to balance with legislative and executive branches. He cautioned against evaluating the court based on outcomes, advocating for access to justice and advancing technology to enhance transparency in judicial processes.
Today, On 18th October, the Supreme Court criticized Jharkhand for filing frivolous petitions, imposing a Rs. 1 lakh fine. Despite prior warnings, the state’s conduct remained unchanged, prompting the Court to emphasize responsible legal practices. The case involved a dismissed employee, whose appeal was rejected, leading to the state’s unsuccessful appeal to the Supreme Court.