Today, On 28th February, The Allahabad High Court ruled that no painting will be done at the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, allowing only cleaning of the premises. The decision came after the ASI inspected the site and found no need for painting. The Muslim side had requested painting before Ramadan, but the Hindu side opposed it, citing concerns over evidence tampering. The court’s ruling brings relief to the Hindu side while the Muslim side may present further arguments in the next hearing.
Allahabad: Today, 27th Feb, The Allahabad High Court instructed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to inspect the Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal to determine whether it requires whitewashing and painting. This decision came after the mosque management committee sought permission to carry out the maintenance work before Ramzan.
The Supreme Court directed a petitioner, Mohammed Ghayoor, to approach the jurisdictional high court for contempt proceedings against Sambhal authorities for allegedly violating demolition guidelines. Authorities bulldozed Ghayoor’s property without prior notice in January, contravening a ruling that requires a showcause notice and a response opportunity. The high court is deemed the appropriate forum for redress.
The Supreme Court Today (Jan 24) scheduled a hearing next week on a plea accusing Sambhal authorities of violating its guidelines by demolishing part of Mohammed Ghayoor’s property without notice. This case challenges the court’s prior directive to prevent unauthorized demolitions, potentially reshaping how such cases are addressed in the future.
Hindu Shakti Dal has urged top Indian authorities, including the President and Prime Minister, to reopen the 1978 Sambhal riots case, alleging past governments shielded accused perpetrators. Simran Gupta, the group’s leader, called for a CBI and NIA investigation to ensure justice for victims’ families, claiming the riots were mishandled. The group also highlighted its other actions, including legal efforts on disputed religious sites and property acquisitions linked to Dawood Ibrahim.
Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court ruled against allowing puja at the well located within Sambhal’s Jama Masjid amid an ongoing temple-mosque dispute. The court emphasized maintaining the status quo while addressing the sensitive matter. It has also issued a notice to the Uttar Pradesh government, seeking its response on the issue. The case highlights the judicial approach to balancing religious sentiments and legal considerations.
Today, On 8th January, The Allahabad High Court issued a stay order to the civil court case regarding the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. The mosque’s management committee filed a revision petition after a Supreme Court ruling. There were concerns raised about the fast pace of early judgments and surveys. The High Court has asked for responses by February 25.
In 2024, India’s Supreme Court dealt with numerous landmark rulings, focusing on personal liberty, places of worship disputes, and electoral reforms. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna emphasized efficiency, reforming case backlogs. Notable cases included prohibitions on religious site surveys, striking down electoral bonds, and addressing environmental pollution. The court’s decisions significantly influenced legal frameworks and societal issues.
Vishnu Shankar Jain, a lawyer representing the Hindu side in a mosque-temple dispute, filed an FIR after receiving a threatening comment on social media from Nidhi Jha, inciting community tensions. The case includes charges of criminal intimidation and provocation. The Supreme Court emphasizes maintaining peace amid ongoing disputes and violence in Sambhal.