On Wednesday(15th May),CJI D Y Chandrachud highlighted the imperative for judges to craft judgments accessible to the public at the Rio J-20 summit, attended by Chief Justices from J-20 nations.
Today (13th May): The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea seeking an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for alleged communal speeches during the election campaign, deeming it “misconceived” and “without merit.” The court emphasized the Election Commission of India’s independent authority to handle the matter, stating that it cannot intervene in the ECI’s proceedings.
The Supreme Court of India has granted an interim stay on the imprisonment of retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar, following a contempt of court proceeding initiated by cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni. The case is set for a detailed hearing on May 3. The Madras High Court found Kumar guilty of contempt for derogatory comments.
New delhi: The recent statement “We will rip you apart” by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah sparked a debate about judicial decorum. Judges expressed concern over the appropriateness of such language for a high judicial position, citing the need for impartial discussions and maintaining sobriety in court proceedings. Past rulings emphasize the high standards of behavior expected from judges.
Former Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, discussed the distinction between judicial activism and judicial overreach, highlighting the judiciary’s responsibility to bring about constructive change while respecting boundaries. He emphasized the transformative impact of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and the need for timely justice to uphold public trust and the rule of law.
The Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) urged law firms to refrain from mass poaching, emphasizing the importance of adhering to its Code of Conduct stressing basic courtesies when recruiting from other firms. SILF condemned attempts to undermine the judiciary, highlighting the need for fair and impartial administration of justice.
At the 2024 ABA-India Conference, Justice Hima Kohli emphasized the Indian judiciary’s commitment to sustainable economic development and the interdependence of economic progress, environmental preservation, and individual rights. She highlighted the potential for collaboration with the United States to enhance economic development and strengthen democratic and legal foundations. The judiciary’s focus on sustainable growth can position India as a global leader in environmentally conscious economic development.
The Supreme Court has highlighted the dangers of celebratory firing at weddings, emphasizing the loss of innocent lives. The accessibility of illegal firearms, particularly in Uttar Pradesh, was criticized as a violation of the right to life. Justices also emphasized that the right to bear arms is not a fundamental right protected by the Constitution.