Delhi Court cautions ED to act fairly and avoid sensationalism on social media, stressing that any misleading or defamatory content may violate Article 21. “Such abuse of power undermines fundamental rights and agency’s integrity.”
A Delhi court has set aside a prior ruling that dismissed a cheating case against Gautam Gambhir, instructing the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate potential money laundering activities. The court found the previous discharge order inadequate, highlighting Gambhir’s financial dealings related to a real estate project and the need for further scrutiny.
![[BREAKING] SC Extended Deadline For AAP To Vacate Delhi Office Premise By 10th August](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-65.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court today highlighted a shortage of courtrooms and emphasized that the land allotted for the AAP office has not been used. The Supreme Court extended the deadline for AAP to vacate its office to August 10, granting an additional extension due to pending elections. The court directed AAP to seek alternative land.
![[Journalist Assault] AAP Media Coordinator's Bail Dismissed by Court Citing 'Not Maintainable'](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, The Tis Hazari Court in Delhi dismissed AAP Media Coordinator Vikas Kumar Yogi’s anticipatory bail plea in the journalist assault case for procedural inadequacy as the mentioned offenses are currently bailable. The court highlighted legal challenges faced by the accused, citing a typographical error in the police statement and lack of grounds for custodial interrogation.
Today, On 16th May, The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) withdrew its petition from the Supreme Court seeking office land in New Delhi, indicating a shift in strategy. The party aims to explore alternative solutions outside the judicial process. This decision follows the ongoing proceedings at the Delhi High Court and the rejection of their land allocation request.
The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, expressed dissatisfaction with the Aam Aadmi Party’s political office in Delhi, constructed on encroached land originally designated for the High Court. The court directed the Delhi government officials to meet with the High Court Registrar General to address the issue. The court also criticized the government’s delay in approving funds for judiciary infrastructure.