Supreme Court Slams Chaotic Lawyer Submissions: “Ten People Look at Us and Shout, Which Voice Do We Catch?”

The Supreme Court criticised the growing chaos in courtrooms, saying lawyers shouting together was damaging hearings. “Ten people look at us and shout, which voice do we catch?” Justice Bhatti remarked, expressing serious concern.

“Why Are You Harassing Students? You Are State. Don’t Make it an Ego Issue”: SC Restrains Karnataka from Declaring Results of Half-yearly Exams of Classes 8 to 10

The Supreme Court today (21st Oct) has criticized the Karnataka government for “harassing” students by conducting board examinations for classes 8 to 10, prohibiting the declaration of results until further notice. This follows the withdrawal of a circular for board exams in several rural districts, while exams proceeded in others. The court seeks detailed examination process information within four weeks.

“It’s Not a Coffee Shop”: CJI Chandrachud Pulls Up a Party-in Person Over ‘Yeah’ Remarks

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud today (30th Sept) criticized a lawyer for using informal language in court, stating he is “allergic” to expressions like “yeah.” The discussion revolved around the lawyer’s petition against former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi. Consequently, the Chief Justice emphasized that a judge cannot be impugned in such cases and instructed to amend the petition.

Supreme Court Demands Explanation from Registry for ‘Repeated Failure’ to List Case Despite Clear Court Directive

The Supreme Court reprimanded its Registry for failing to list a Special Leave Petition as directed, stressing the need for compliance with court orders. The Court warned of serious consequences for repeated errors or negligence in handling case files and instructed the Registry to provide a report explaining its determination that the petition was filed on time.

“Terrifying Order” Himachal Pradesh HC Slams Civil judge for Passing Reckless Order

The Himachal Pradesh High Court criticized a civil court judge for issuing a coercive order without prior notice, emphasizing the violation of legal principles and fundamental rights. The judge apologized, citing workload and infrastructure issues but was warned that expeditiousness must not overlook legal requirements. The High Court highlighted the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to legal procedures.