Today, On 2nd August, A PIL filed against Maharashtra’s ‘Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana’ cash benefit scheme, claiming it burdens taxpayers and violates the Representation of People Act. The High Court refused an urgent hearing, stating the matter will be heard as per the auto-listing system. The scheme aims to provide financial assistance to eligible women.
The TNCC lawyers filed an urgent motion with the ECI to prevent PM Modi from exploiting his official position during a spiritual visit to Vivekananda Rock. They fear political exploitation and seek fair conduct amid concerns over proximity to the Parliamentary elections. The petition emphasizes the need to maintain the sanctity of religious spaces and prevent the influence of partisan politics.
The Supreme Court ruled that political parties’ manifesto promises, potentially leading to financial aid for the public, do not constitute ‘corrupt practices’ under the law. The Court emphasized the need for scrutiny and accountability in implementing such promises. A voter’s appeal challenging the Congress party’s promises was rejected, leaving the legal question open for future consideration.
Taking selfies or videos in polling booths is illegal, ensuring voter privacy and preventing election interference. Technology in elections can improve accessibility but introduces cybersecurity risks. India’s laws safeguard voting privacy, prohibiting disclosure of voting choice and use of electronic devices in polling stations. Violations may result in legal consequences and disqualification as a voter.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the Congress party’s 2023 election manifesto pledges are not considered ‘corrupt practices’ under the Representation of People Act of 1951. The court emphasized that policy declarations by political parties cannot be classified as corrupt practices and stated that the validity of policies should be left to the voters’ discretion. The court rejected a petition challenging the election of a Congress MLA based on the party’s manifesto.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that election manifesto pledges, like the ‘five guarantees’, do not constitute corrupt practices. The dismissal of a petition against Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad sets a precedent, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence implicating candidates for commitments outlined in manifestos to be deemed as corrupt practices. The decision safeguards the democratic process and clarifies the legal standing of election promises.
On Tuesday (2nd April): The DMK filed writ petitions with the Madras High Court concerning EVM issues before the Lok Sabha elections, alleging that the presence of a printer between the Balloting Unit and Control Unit compromises data integrity. The party expressed concerns about the Election Commission of India’s oversight and transparency in decision-making. Additionally, a petition challenges the ECI’s guideline on VVPAT verification.
Madras High Court has asserted that while voting is an essential civic duty, citizens cannot be compelled to exercise their franchise. This decision reaffirms the delicate balance between promoting electoral participation and respecting individual liberties. CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has asserted that while voting is an essential civic duty, citizens cannot be compelled to […]
The Supreme Court of India rejected a petition for digital monitoring of elected Members of Parliament (MPs), stating it violates their privacy and undermines parliamentary democracy. The court warned against filing similar pleas in the future and cautioned against trivializing MPs’ roles. The petitioner’s counsel proposed round-the-clock CCTV monitoring, but the Chief Justice found it impractical and invasive.