Karnataka HC Grants Bail to Advocate G. Devaraje Gowda in Rape Case Amid Election Petition Against Politicians

The Karnataka High Court has granted bail to Advocate G. Devaraje Gowda, accused of rape. Justice M.G. Uma’s decision is notable due to Gowda’s history of filing election petitions against political figures. The court highlighted the delay in the complaint, credibility of allegations, and Gowda’s involvement in filing election petitions before granting bail. Conditions of his release were set to ensure compliance with legal proceedings.

Child Marriage and Rape Case | Court Sentences Man to 10 Years Imprisonment, Awards Rs.10.5 Lakh Compensation to Victim

The Delhi Tis Hazari Court sentenced a 49-year-old man to 10 years in prison for child marriage and rape of a 13-year-old girl, and awarded her Rs.10.5 lakh in compensation. The court found the victim was forced into the marriage due to her difficult circumstances, and the accused violated her rights and child protection laws.

Unnao Rape Victim’s Father’s Death Case| Delhi HC Rejects Kuldeep Sengar’s Plea to Suspend Sentence

Today, On 7th June, The Delhi High Court rejected former BJP MLA Kuldeep Sengar’s plea to suspend his sentence in the Unnao rape victim’s father’s death case. Sengar, serving a life sentence for the rape, sought relief from his 10-year imprisonment for the custodial death. The court emphasized the gravity of the charges and the need for justice.

Supreme Court Orders Ban on ‘Two-Finger Test’ in Rape Cases in Meghalaya

The Supreme Court of India reiterated its prohibition of the ‘two-finger test’ in rape cases, emphasizing its unscientific nature and violation of women’s dignity. Despite legal bans and guidelines, the test persists, highlighting the need for greater enforcement and survivor-centered care. The court instructed states to ensure comprehensive prohibition of this practice.

Delhi HC Sets Aside Bail Order in Rape Case Due to Victim’s ‘Right to Be Heard’ Ignored

The Delhi High Court revoked a bail order in a rape case due to the alleged victim not being given the opportunity to be heard, violating her rights. The court highlighted the importance of the victim’s participation in judicial proceedings, emphasizing the need to uphold their rights at every stage following the offense. The accused must submit a new bail application within two weeks.

Kerala High Court Grants Bail to Advocate PG Manu in Rape Case

The Kerala High Court, under Justice Sophy Thomas, has granted bail to P G Manu, a former senior government pleader accused of multiple rapes, emphasizing the importance of addressing allegations against authority figures while safeguarding the survivor’s well-being. The Kerala High Court, on March 22, made headlines by granting bail to Advocate PG Manu, previously […]

Delhi High Court Denies Permission for Ramzan Prayers at Site of Demolished Ancient Akhunji Mosque

Delhi High Court has declined a request for conducting Ramzan prayers at the site of the ancient Akhunji Mosque, which was demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The Delhi High Court has declined a request for conducting Ramzan prayers at the site of the ancient Akhunji Mosque, which was demolished by the Delhi Development […]

Supreme Court’s Stance on Relationship Changes: Refuses To Quash Rape Case

The Supreme Court refused to quash a rape case, underscoring the nuanced nature of consent and its implications in legal frameworks. The Supreme Court found the allegations not to be sufficiently persuasive to discredit the possibility of rape. The Supreme Court of India delved into the complexities of consent within relationships, highlighting that consent can […]

Supreme Court Acquits Man in Rape Case, Highlights Consensual Nature of Relationship with Married Woman

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday has acquitted a man, Vinod Gupta, previously accused of raping a woman under the pretext of marriage. The ruling, delivered by Justices CT Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal, sheds light on the complexities surrounding consent, marital status, and legal accountability in relationships. Also read- Delhi High Court Clarifies: Expecting […]

Madras High Court Advocates for Privacy: Upholds ‘Right to be Forgotten’ for Acquitted Individual

The Madras High Court’s recent ruling reinforces the ‘Right to be Forgotten,’ acknowledging the importance of privacy and individuals’ ability to move on from past legal issues. This sets a precedent for similar cases, balancing public information and personal privacy in the digital age. The decision emphasizes the evolving nature of privacy rights and the impact of digital records on individuals’ lives.