The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that soldiers are presumed to be in good health at the time of enlistment, and any later health issues are assumed to be caused or worsened by military service unless proven otherwise. The Court directed the Union of India to grant disability pension to a retired soldier, highlighting that the employer must provide strong evidence to deny such claims.
Justice Rajesh Bindal, born on April 16, 1961, in Ambala, Haryana, assumed office as a Supreme Court judge on February 13, 2023. He previously served at the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Jammu & Kashmir High Court, and Calcutta High Court, and as Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court. He will retire on April 15, 2027, after a distinguished career.
As of November 21, 2024, India’s judiciary faces severe challenges with 5,200 unfilled positions and 4.53 crore pending cases. The Supreme Court has two vacancies while High Courts have 364, predominantly in Allahabad. Initiatives to translate judgments into regional languages aim to improve access to legal resources amidst these issues.
![[NDPS Cases]"Bail May Be Granted for Ganja and Charas Cases, Not for Heroin": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-46.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, 1st August, The Supreme Court ruled that bail may be granted in NDPS cases involving ganja and charas but not for those involving heroin due to its severe impact, particularly on the younger generation. An accused in a heroin case was denied bail despite advanced age and indirect possession. The court maintains a strict stance on heroin-related offenses.
Jaswant Singh, an AAP leader, today withdrew his Supreme Court petition challenging his arrest and remand by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case. The Bench granted him the option to apply for bail in the Punjab & Haryana High Court. Singh has been in custody for over six months related to the ED’s investigation into allegations of defrauding banks.
Today, 21st May, The Supreme Court dismissed a plea for re-evaluation of Punjab Judicial Services Mains Exam marks, citing lack of authority. Petitioners requested reconsideration based on discrepancies, but the Court upheld the existing process and advised them to approach the Punjab & Haryana High Court under Article 226 for redress, subsequently granting permission to withdraw the petition.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the requirement for parents to report offenses against their child under the POCSO Act. It refused to quash an application against a mother for failing to report her son’s sexual harassment, leading to his suicide. The case highlights legal obligations and judicial discretion under the POCSO Act.
The division bench at Punjab and Haryana High Court, consisting of Justices Sureshwar Thakur and Sudeepti Sharma, was compelled to issue the notice following the Presiding Officer’s claim that CCTV footage for a specific day’s proceedings was unavailable due to the absence of cameras in the tribunal The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued […]
The mayoral election in Chandigarh has become embroiled in controversy, with allegations of fraud and procedural violations. The BJP candidate emerged victorious, but the rejection of eight votes sparked legal challenges. The court has opted to adjourn the matter, leaving the city’s leadership hanging in the balance. The outcome will have far-reaching implications for electoral politics.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has issued a notice in response to an AAP councillor’s petition regarding alleged fraudulent activities in the Chandigarh Mayor polls, directing respondents to reply within three weeks. The petition claims manipulation of votes and bias by election officers, raising serious concerns about electoral integrity in local governance and necessitating a thorough investigation.