The Cash-at-Judge’s-Door case has taken a new turn as former Chandigarh IGP Rajesh Kumar admitted to a clerical error in his statement. He clarified that the mistake involved the name of a judge, raising questions about the accuracy of key records in the case. The 2008 scandal involved an alleged cash delivery meant for Justice Nirmal Yadav, sparking a legal controversy.
Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Indian Legislative Process In a pivotal move, the Supreme Court of India is deliberating on the establishment of guidelines to define the circumstances under which state governors can refer bills passed by state legislatures to the President for assent. This development arises from a petition filed by the Kerala government, […]
