Yesterday, On 23rd October, the Bombay High Court denied anticipatory bail to the father of a friend of a minor involved in a fatal Porsche crash in Pune. The court cited sufficient evidence of his involvement in tampering with blood samples. The ongoing investigation raises significant concerns over underage driving and legal accountability.
Today, On 15th October, the Supreme Court ruled that a benchmark disability alone cannot disqualify individuals from pursuing medical education. Candidates can only be barred if deemed incapable by a disability assessment board. The decision emphasized the need for specific reasons for eligibility rulings and encouraged the National Medical Commission to ensure inclusive practices.
Actor Randeep Hooda praised Chief Justice DY Chandrachud for modernizing the judicial system, introducing paperless processes and live streaming of proceedings at the Supreme Court. Reflecting on his experience, Hooda admired the court’s decorum and highlighted the profound societal impact of its decisions. He also expressed gratitude to advocate Vineet Dhanda for facilitating his visit.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a cheating case against a woman who eloped before her wedding. The court highlighted her struggle to express her romantic relationship. The judges ruled that there was no evidence of deception, emphasizing the absence of dishonest intent. The woman’s family faced defamation and embarrassment after the elopement.
![[Trademark Dispute] Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief to 'Burger King' in Case Against Pune Eatery](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-48-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th August, The Bombay High Court issued an interim stay on a Pune court’s decision to allow a local burger joint to use the ‘Burger King’ trademark. The U.S.-based Burger King Corporation contested the ruling, claiming brand reputation damage. The court requested documents for review and scheduled a further hearing. The local restaurant had been using the name since 1992, pre-dating the corporation’s trademark registration in India. The Pune court ruled in favor of the local establishment, citing lack of evidence for damages claimed by both parties.
![[Elgar Parishad Case] SC Refuses to Grant Interim Bail to Jailed Activist Jyoti Jagtap](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-38-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court refused interim bail to Jyoti Jagtap, a jailed activist in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. The court also postponed the hearing on her main bail plea. Jagtap’s involvement in provocative activities led to her arrest, and she faces charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The case highlights ongoing complexities and delays in resolution.
![[Porsche Accident] Pune Police to Challenge Bombay HC Order for Release of 17-Year-Old in Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cats-85.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today(on 1st July),Pune police plan to challenge the Bombay High Court’s decision to release a 17-year-old involved in a fatal Porsche accident in the Supreme Court. The High Court stressed adherence to juvenile justice laws. The police argue the teen was under the influence of alcohol while driving, causing the deaths of two IT professionals. The case has led to various legal entanglements for the juvenile’s family.
![[Pune Porsche Crash Case] Minor's Remand Extended by Juvenile Justice Board Till June 25](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-59-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 12th June, A 17-year-old boy’s remand extended by the Juvenile Justice Board till June 25 in connection with a fatal car crash in Pune. The incident, involving a Porsche allegedly driven by the teen, resulted in the deaths of two IT engineers. The boy’s parents are also in custody for tampering with his blood samples. Several arrests have been made related to serving alcohol to the minor.