Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.
Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the complexities of judicial appointments in India, emphasizing the collaboration between the judiciary and government. He addressed concerns over delays, stressing the importance of a robust dialogue and acknowledging the role of multiple stakeholders. Chandrachud maintained that this multi-layered process ensures fairness and upholds judicial independence.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today (13th Nov) ruled that demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful. In issuing guidelines, the Court emphasized the rule of law, separation of powers, and accountability. No demolition should occur without a proper notice and opportunity for appeal. Officials failing to follow these directives may face personal financial consequences.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court rejected a petition by activist K.A. Paul for a CBI investigation into alleged adulteration of Tirupati Laddu, citing the impracticality of creating separate states for religious matters. Previous claims of animal fat usage in the laddus caused political conflict, with ongoing investigations managed by a Special Investigation Team.
The Bombay High Court today criticized Maharashtra Police for mishandling the sexual abuse case of two 4-year-old girls at a Badlapur school. It highlighted delays in taking statements, registering the case, and lack of action against the school authorities. The Court emphasized the need for prompt action under the POCSO Act and counseling for the victims.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court criticized a civil court judge for issuing a coercive order without prior notice, emphasizing the violation of legal principles and fundamental rights. The judge apologized, citing workload and infrastructure issues but was warned that expeditiousness must not overlook legal requirements. The High Court highlighted the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to legal procedures.
The Supreme Court will hear the bail petition of former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia regarding an alleged money laundering scam related to the liquor policy case. Sisodia’s previous bail pleas were rejected, and the case has drawn attention due to accusations of deliberate delays. Sisodia’s arrest and the money trail amounting to Rs 338 crore are also significant.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail to the civic official involved in the creation of bogus votes. Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao highlighted that the creation of such a large number of fake votes contradicted the essence of democracy. Andhra Pradesh: This Month (1st May): The Andhra Pradesh High Court refused to grant […]
![[ Controversial Tweet] Bhushan Accuses Judge of Political Dog-Whistling, Must Read SC EVM'S Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-9-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Prominent public figure Prashant Bhushan accused a judge of politically motivated “dog-whistling” in a controversial tweet. His critics attribute this to his history of judicial criticism and losing public interest litigations. The debate raises questions about judicial integrity and the need for respectful critique. Bhushan’s conduct may lead to potential contempt proceedings, provoking concerns about free speech.
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has ordered the Election Commission of India (ECI) to disclose information about Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs). This decision followed a second appeal by retired civil servant MG Devasahayam. The ECI must provide the requested data within 30 days. Compliance with the order is mandatory.