NEW DELHI: Senior Congress leaders have approached the Supreme Court. They have filed a petition requesting that the Election Commission of India (ECI) be directed to upload Form 17C on its official website immediately after polling concludes.Form 17C provides important details about the number of votes cast at each polling station. The public interest litigation (PIL) also seeks an urgent interim order from the Supreme Court, directing the Election Commission to upload Form 17C for the upcoming Delhi Assembly Elections 2025 and all future elections without delay.
Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna emphasized that an anti-corruption mediator, like the Lokpal, must work closely with agencies such as the Central Vigilance Commission. This coordination is essential to effectively address corruption and safeguard public systems. He stressed that collaboration strengthens accountability and enhances trust in institutions. Public faith, he noted, is crucial for the success of such efforts.
The Allahabad High Court, recognizing flaws in the 2022 UPPSC Judicial Services Examination, appointed a commission led by Justice Govind Mathur to reform the evaluation process. The commission will report by May 31, 2025, addressing issues like lack of standardized marking and procedural lapses that undermine the UPPSC’s credibility and public trust.
Today, On 6th December, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar announced an investigation after currency notes were found on MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi’s seat during a routine check. Singhvi expressed disbelief, citing his brief presence in the House. He called for cooperation in investigating the incident and addressing security concerns.
![[Senthil Balaji Case] "Granting Bail, Then Assuming a Ministerial Position Raises Concerns of Witness Intimidation": SC to Investigate Allegations of Witness Tampering](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-1-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 2nd December, The Supreme Court has raised concerns over Tamil Nadu Minister Senthil Balaji’s bail, granted just before his ministerial appointment. The court will investigate potential witness intimidation linked to his new role amid ongoing cash-for-jobs scam allegations. Balaji’s influential position may hinder witness cooperation regarding serious money laundering claims.
Former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud warned against the influence of pressure groups and social media on judicial outcomes, urging judges to maintain independence and focus on constitutional values. He noted the dangers of forming opinions based on brief social media content, emphasizing the judiciary’s role in democracy and the complexities of law interpretation.
Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.
Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the complexities of judicial appointments in India, emphasizing the collaboration between the judiciary and government. He addressed concerns over delays, stressing the importance of a robust dialogue and acknowledging the role of multiple stakeholders. Chandrachud maintained that this multi-layered process ensures fairness and upholds judicial independence.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today (13th Nov) ruled that demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful. In issuing guidelines, the Court emphasized the rule of law, separation of powers, and accountability. No demolition should occur without a proper notice and opportunity for appeal. Officials failing to follow these directives may face personal financial consequences.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court rejected a petition by activist K.A. Paul for a CBI investigation into alleged adulteration of Tirupati Laddu, citing the impracticality of creating separate states for religious matters. Previous claims of animal fat usage in the laddus caused political conflict, with ongoing investigations managed by a Special Investigation Team.