Today, On 7th October, CJI Gavai flagged concerns over social media coverage of court proceedings during the Judges Association case. He warned, “Otherwise your clients will be offended,” highlighting the need to restrict reporting to protect the dignity of ongoing judicial matters.
Today, On 18th September, Karnataka High Court has dismissed a PIL seeking to stay the release of Jolly LLB 3, imposing a Rs.50,000 cost on petitioner Syeda Neelufur for wasting judicial time. The Court warned of coercive action if payment is not made by October 4.
Today, On 17th September, On The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to block the release of Jolly LLB 3, which claimed the film mocks the judiciary. The court said, “Don’t worry, we face the mocking right from day one of our judgeships.”
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition against Akshay Kumar’s Jolly LLB 3, stating there was “nothing objectionable, no hindrance to legal profession”, after reviewing the song Bhai Vakeel Hai and finding no disrespect to advocates.
Former CJI DY Chandrachud responded to the bungalow controversy saying their packing is done and they’ll shift the next day the house is ready. He said the allotted home needs major repairs, which caused the delay.
Elvish Yadav, known for his strong personality, opened up about his controversies and legal troubles, saying, “A lot of time is wasted in court,” as he reflected on the lessons learned from his past experiences.
Actor Vijay Raaz was acquitted in the 2020 sexual harassment case due to lack of proof. The court observed, “Failed to present sufficient evidence,” while his lawyer said the false claim badly hurt his career.
Sr. Adv. Aryama Sundaram strongly opposed linking an NDPS case to the Pahalgam terror attack in the Supreme Court. He highlighted the serious impact on the accused’s family, saying, “Children are being bullied in school, called children of terrorists.”
During a discussion on CJI DY Chandrachud’s legacy, retired Justice RC Chavan criticized his concern for public perception, deeming it inappropriate for a judge. While some praised Chandrachud’s judgment style, others noted limited reforms and urged judges to prioritize impartiality over legacy. Chavan also raised concerns about hastily introduced livestreaming of court proceedings.
