Today (8th May): The Delhi High Court fined a petitioner Rs 1 lakh for seeking a media gag on reporting about Arvind Kejriwal. The court rejected a PIL seeking to restrain media channels from airing sensational headlines and imposed the fine, criticizing the attempt to stifle political rivals. The plea was dismissed, and the court clarified its limitations in imposing censorship or curtailing opponents’ rights.
Today (30th April): Former Tamil Nadu Minister V. Senthil Balaji’s court remand has been extended until June 4th in connection with a money laundering case related to a cash-for-jobs scam during his tenure as Transport Minister. The court has instructed the verification of original bank records. Balaji’s bail plea has faced rejections, and the Supreme Court is set to hear the case.
The Supreme Court expressed concern over the state of marriages, lamenting that couples are marrying only to end up filing cases shortly after. Justices remarked that the institution of marriage is under strain due to increasing marital disputes, highlighting societal shifts. The comments were made in response to a case where a couple faced difficulties consummating their marriage.
Today, 19th April,The Supreme Court issued notices in response to a petition challenging anti-profiteering measures in India. The petition questions the validity of these measures and their impact on businesses, particularly in the real estate sector. This signals potential legal scrutiny and reflects ongoing debates on pricing policies and consumer protection laws.
Today,18th April,The Supreme Court postponed its ruling on industrial alcohol regulation, causing uncertainty in the industry. The decision revolves around the overlapping powers of the Centre and states. The nine-judge bench is reviewing the matter, which stems from conflicting interpretations of legislative competence. The final judgment’s implications for the industry remain pending.
The Calcutta High Court allowed a government doctor to resign and contest the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, emphasizing the public interest served by individuals aspiring to be public representatives. Dr. Pranat Tudu’s case from Jhargram Government Medical College sparked discussions on individual rights and public interest, referencing Clause 14 of the West Bengal Service Rules. The court’s decision sets a precedent for political participation in public service roles.
Today, on 16th March: The Orissa High Court has postponed the hearing on the missing keys of Puri Jagannath Temple’s ‘Ratna Bhandar’ for two weeks in response to a PIL. The PIL seeks to present the Justice Raghubir Das Commission of Enquiry report in the state Assembly. The State Government requested two weeks to file an affidavit.
On 6th March: The Supreme Court revoked a police officer’s bail for altering a suspect’s name, emphasizing officers’ duty to uphold integrity in law enforcement. High Court’s leniency was criticized, given the seriousness of the allegations. The respondent’s position as an investigating officer necessitates different considerations, and potential tampering risks led to bail revocation. (Word count: 50)
![[Breaking] Supreme Court Strikes Down Haryana's 5-Marks Reservation in Employment Exams](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-16-1.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
