Today, On 9t April, The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) that sought measures to protect peacocks from electrocution caused by overhead power lines. The petitioner had urged authorities to insulate electrical infrastructure in areas populated by the national bird. However, the court found no merit in the plea. It emphasized that such issues fall under the purview of concerned wildlife and power authorities.
Today, On 9th April, In the “traitor” remark case, the Bombay High Court clarified that the Maharashtra government has not taken any vindictive action against individuals for re-sharing or re-uploading comedian Kunal Kamra’s video. The statement came during a hearing on related petitions. The court emphasized the importance of protecting free speech. It also noted that no coercive steps have been initiated so far.
Today, On 8th April, During a hearing on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting the rise in crimes against women, particularly rape cases, the Supreme Court made a strong appeal to the government. The bench stated, “Leave the women alone in this country; let them grow,” urging authorities to broaden sensitisation efforts. The Court stressed the urgent need for awareness and prevention measures. It emphasized that protecting women’s rights and dignity must be a national priority.
Today, On 5th April, Justice Yashwant Varma has taken oath as a judge of the Allahabad High Court, even as he faces corruption allegations. He was recently transferred from the Delhi High Court after cash was found at his home during a fire incident last month. An internal inquiry is currently underway. The situation has raised questions, but the judicial process continues.
A petition has been filed in the Allahabad High Court seeking to prevent Justice Yashwant Varma from taking oath. The PIL refers to an ongoing in-house inquiry ordered by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) regarding the discovery of “four to five semi-burnt sacks” of Indian currency notes at Justice Varma’s residence. The notes were reportedly recovered after a fire incident last month, raising concerns over possible misconduct. The plea urges the court to withhold his oath until the investigation is complete.
Today, On 1st April, The Tripura government informed the Supreme Court that it is complying with the 2006 apex court ruling on police reforms. It stated that the process for appointing a regular Director General of Police (DGP) began on March 7. The update was provided in response to concerns over adherence to established guidelines. This move aims to ensure transparency and efficiency in police leadership appointments.
Today, On 26th March, The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed against rapper Yo Yo Honey Singh’s song ‘Maniac’. The petition had raised objections to the song’s lyrics, alleging they were inappropriate. However, the petitioner later sought to withdraw the case, and the court granted permission. With this decision, the legal challenge against the song has come to an end.
Today, On 26th March, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL demanding a judicial probe into the Karnataka honeytrap case, calling it “political nonsense.” The petitioner’s counsel argued that the allegations were serious and required thorough investigation. However, the court refused to entertain the plea, emphasizing that such matters should not be used for political motives. The decision puts an end to any immediate legal intervention in the controversy.
Today, On 25th March, The Supreme Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed over 20 years ago seeking the conservation and restoration of Red Fort. The petition aimed to ensure the preservation of the historic monument, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Noting progress in its upkeep, the court deemed further intervention unnecessary. With this decision, the long-pending legal battle for Red Fort’s protection comes to an end.
Today, On 24th March, The Delhi High Court has given a three-month deadline to a designated panel to submit a comprehensive report on deepfakes. The court emphasized the urgency of addressing the growing threat posed by AI-generated fake content. It stressed the need for concrete recommendations to tackle misuse and regulatory gaps. The panel’s findings are expected to shape future legal frameworks on deepfake technology.