The Allahabad High Court said couples marrying against parents’ wishes can’t get police protection without real danger. The court emphasized support from each other is key unless serious threats exist.
NEW DELHI: Today (11th Feb): The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW), which is associated with the CPI. The PIL raised concerns about the rising incidents of mob lynching and violence, especially by cow vigilantes. The Bench, led by Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, referred to its previous ruling in the case of Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and stated that while the ruling is binding on all authorities, the Court cannot oversee or monitor such incidents in every part of the country.
![[Excise 'Scam'] Delhi HC Issues Notice Over Manish Sisodia’s Plea Challenging ED's Charge Sheet Over Lack Of Sanction](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-6-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court, on Monday (2nd Dec) led by Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, will hear former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia’s plea against the ED’s charges on December 20. Sisodia argues that the charges lack prior sanction under CrPC due to his public servant status, echoing the Supreme Court’s ruling that requires such approval for prosecution.
A petition submitted to the Calcutta High Court on June 6th requested police protection for opposition party workers due to alleged post-poll violence in certain areas of West Bengal after the Lok Sabha elections. The court allowed the petitioner to file the plea, with a vacation bench indicating that the matter might be addressed later in the day.
![[Manipur Violence] "Court Has to Go by the Law Not by Sentiment": SC Refused to Entertain Contempt Petition](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court dismissed today, a contempt petition against Manipur authorities for failing to protect the properties of displaced persons during recent violence. The court stated that no contempt was made, emphasizing the need to involve encroachers as parties to the case before taking action. Encroachments on properties should be addressed through separate proceedings.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court fined a married teacher Rs. 50,000 for seeking legal protection in his live-in relationship with a 19-year-old student, emphasizing the misuse of legal processes in personal relationship matters. The court’s decision aims to deter educators from abusing the law and upholds the sanctity of marriage.
The Calcutta High Court temporarily suspended legal proceedings regarding an FIR against Enforcement Directorate (ED) officers, following a violent raid at a Trinamool Congress leader’s house. The court also dismissed a petition seeking investigation by NIA or CBI into the incident. BJP staged a protest, while the Trinamool leader remains elusive.