Uttarakhand High Court says, “Dignity of women is absolutely non-negotiable.” It orders the takedown of social media posts targeting a woman lawyer who secured acquittal for a POCSO case accused, urging respect and prompt legal action.
Today, On 20th January, The Kerala High Court raised doubts about the POCSO case filed against journalists from Reporter TV. The Court observed that neither the minor girl involved nor her guardians had lodged any complaint. It assured that the journalists would be granted bail if arrested. The case has drawn attention to the role of media and legal procedures in such matters.
![[POCSO Cases] "Police Should Go After Persons Leaking Sensitive Information, Not Journalists": HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/img.png?resize=267%2C168&ssl=1)
The High Court criticized police actions in POCSO Act cases, emphasizing that they should target those leaking sensitive information instead of journalists. The court highlighted the importance of press freedom and mandated investigations to uncover real offenders. It also noted police misconduct toward a minor victim and ordered protection measures and a CBI investigation.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the importance of compensation as a vital aspect of justice, aiding victims in their healing and recovery. In a recent ruling, the court increased the award for a sexual abuse survivor from Rs.85,000 to Rs.10.5 lakhs. This decision reflects a commitment to providing adequate support for those who have endured traumatic experiences. The court acknowledged the long-lasting effects of such abuse on victims’ mental well-being. By enhancing the financial compensation, the court aims to empower survivors to rebuild their lives. This ruling serves as a reminder of the judicial system’s role in addressing the needs of victims. Ultimately, it reinforces the idea that justice goes beyond punishment and includes meaningful support for survivors.
The Meghalaya government has officially banned the ‘two-finger test,’ a controversial practice used to assess sexual history in survivors of rape. The decision, communicated to the Supreme Court and detailed in a June 27, 2024, circular, aims to ensure respectful and dignified treatment for survivors, with strict penalties for non-compliance.
![[Wrestler Sexual Harassment Case] BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh Moves Delhi HC Seeking Quashing of FIR](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-68-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 28th August, Former BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh has sought to quash sexual harassment charges made by wrestlers, appealing to the Delhi High Court to nullify the trial court proceedings, including the FIR and the charges framed against him. The trial court found sufficient evidence to charge Singh, who faces accusations from multiple women wrestlers. Assistant Secretary Vinod Tomar also faces criminal intimidation charges.
The Kerala High Court ruled that a man’s actions of exposing himself to a minor and asking her to measure his penis are prima facie offenses under the POCSO Act and IPC. The Court emphasized the need for proof of intent and determined that the accused’s behavior constituted sexual harassment, dismissing his petition to halt proceedings.