Today, 12th August, In the 2002 Nitish Katara murder case, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Sukhdev Pehalwan, stating “Convict must be released after completion of the prescribed prison term”, and directed nationwide action to ensure no prisoner is kept beyond sentence.
Today, On 17th March, The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to an official for failing to decide on the remission plea of a convict in the Nitish Katara murder case. The bench expressed displeasure over the inaction, emphasizing the need for timely decisions in legal matters. The case involves the brutal 2002 murder of Katara, which was classified as an honor killing. The Court has sought an explanation for the delay, stressing accountability in handling remission applications.
![[Illegal Tree Felling] CJI Grants Exemption to Environment Ministry Official & Contractors from Personal Appearance](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-14-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th September, the Supreme Court exempted a Ministry of Environment official and contractors from appearing in a case concerning tree felling in Delhi’s Ridge area, while legal proceedings continue. The court criticized the DDA’s actions regarding deforestation and emphasized the importance of environmental protection and proper judicial processes.
The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to a former Uttar Pradesh principal secretary for providing false statements regarding delays in processing remission applications in the state’s prisons. The Court criticized the official’s inconsistent explanations and emphasized that his actions had jeopardized someone else’s liberty. The case is ongoing, with the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh instructed to provide an explanation by September 24.
![[Vadodara Harni Lake Tragedy] Gujarat HC Criticizes State Government for Shielding Official](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-19-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 27th June, The Gujarat High Court heavily criticized the state government for potentially protecting an official in the Vadodara Harni Lake tragedy, highlighting concerns about accountability and transparency in urban development projects. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the inquiry committee’s report and questioned the credibility of its findings, seeking a more comprehensive investigation.
The Rajasthan High Court criticized the state government for a slow response to petitions, labeling it as “lethargic” and failing to fulfill welfare obligations. Highlighting delays in addressing unemployed individuals’ claims, the court urged the Governor’s intervention to safeguard the state’s interests in the litigation system and court judgments.
