The Delhi High Court, in the Vikas Chawla case, referenced Justice H.R. Khanna’s historic dissent in ADM Jabalpur to emphasize the importance of personal liberty. The court criticized procedural lapses that led to violations of fundamental rights, reinforcing that due process cannot be compromised. It reiterated that constitutional protections must prevail over administrative expediency. This judgment highlights the judiciary’s role in safeguarding individual freedoms against arbitrary state action.
Today, On 6th January, The Supreme Court has scheduled the hearing of Sajjan Kumar’s appeal in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case for July. The court clarified that if the final hearing faces delays, it will consider suspending his sentence. Kumar, a former Congress leader, was convicted in 2018 for his role in the riots. The case remains one of the most significant legal battles linked to the tragic events of 1984.
Today, On 3rd October, Zee Entertainment has informed the Bombay High Court that it is addressing certification issues with the CBFC regarding the film “Emergency.” Delayed from its original release on September 6 due to disputes, the film’s release may proceed if specific cuts are made. The court is monitoring the situation closely, with further hearings scheduled.
Today, On 30th September, Jagdish Tytler, a former Congress leader, challenged murder charges related to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in the Delhi High Court. He claims the trial court’s decision is flawed and insists there is no credible evidence against him, describing the case as a “witch-hunt” after 40 years.
Today, On 25th June, On the 50th anniversary of the Emergency, PM Modi criticized the Congress for undermining democracy and transforming the nation into a prison. He asserted that the party had no right to claim they uphold the Constitution. Other leaders echoed similar sentiments, condemning the Congress for suppressing voices defending constitutional values during the Emergency.
Today, On 13th May, The High Court scheduled a July 22 hearing to review the challenge against Sajjan Kumar’s acquittal in the 1984 riots case. The court addressed the CBI and a witness, seeking trial court records. The acquittal granted Kumar the “benefit of doubt,” while two others were also acquitted. The case has drawn significant attention, and the upcoming session is anticipated to feature detailed arguments from both sides.
The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta criticized the approach of viewing women as mere statistics in the quest for gender equality. Mehta voiced his concerns against the mere numerical increase of women in legal positions, emphasizing the importance of merit over tokenism. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta voiced his concerns against the mere numerical increase of women […]
