The Kerala High Court ruled that a man’s actions of exposing himself to a minor and asking her to measure his penis are prima facie offenses under the POCSO Act and IPC. The Court emphasized the need for proof of intent and determined that the accused’s behavior constituted sexual harassment, dismissing his petition to halt proceedings.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on monday (8th july) challenges the bail granted to Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren, citing the High Court’s decision as “illegal”. Soren, accused in a money laundering case related to a land scam, was released on bail. The ED alleges his involvement in acquiring properties illegally, but Soren denies the charges, calling them politically motivated.
Yesterday, 3rd July, The Enforcement Directorate (ED) plans to challenge the Jharkhand High Court’s decision to grant bail to former Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The ED argues that the court’s belief in Soren’s innocence is mistaken and that he does not meet the requirements of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Soren’s legal battles have drawn widespread attention. The appeal’s outcome could significantly impact his political career and legal processes in Jharkhand.
Today, On 3rd July, The Karnataka High Court instructed the Centre to determine if Power TV can resume broadcasting, after a single judge’s interim order halted its broadcasts due to an expired licence. The court set a six-week deadline for the decision and mandated the Union government to allow Power TV to present its case. The Division Bench declined to lift the stay on broadcasts until the controversy is resolved.
Today, On 28th June, The Bombay High Court ruled that an intimate relationship between adults does not excuse sexual assault, rejecting a request to dismiss a rape case. The court emphasized that initial consent in a relationship does not imply ongoing consent, and prime facie evidence of forced, non-consensual sex was present. The writ petition was dismissed.
Today, On 25th June, The Delhi High Court stayed Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s release, citing errors in the lower court’s decision to grant him bail in a money laundering case related to an alleged excise scam. The High Court emphasized that the lower court failed to “properly evaluate” evidence presented by the Enforcement Directorate, and stated the stay order.
![[Disproportionate Assets Case] Supreme Court Shields Odisha Official from Arrest](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-49-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th June, The Supreme Court granted OAS officer Bijaya Ketan Sahoo interim protection from arrest in a money laundering case, amid allegations of amassing disproportionate assets. The case involves acquiring properties linked to the “proceeds of crime,” and Sahoo is directed to appear before the special PMLA court within two weeks. The plea argued against sudden arrest after being free for years during the investigation.
The Supreme Court will hear Odisha Administrative Service officer Bijaya Ketan Sahoo’s plea for anticipatory bail in a money laundering case involving disproportionate assets. The case, initiated by the Enforcement Directorate, alleges unreported income funnelled into properties and investments. Orissa High Court previously refused anticipatory bail, citing a prima facie case. Subsequent summons have been issued, and a hearing is scheduled for June 24.
![[Elgar Parishad-Maoist Links Case] Supreme Court Seeks NIA's Stand on Interim Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-11-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 14th June, In the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, the Supreme Court questioned the NIA about an activist’s plea for interim bail to attend rituals following his grandmother’s death. The activist faces charges related to alleged Maoist links and seeks temporary relief due to health and humanitarian concerns. The court’s action reflects the broader debate on civil rights and national security.
Today, On 13th June, The Bombay High Court ordered a stay on the release of the film ‘Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar’ following Karan Johar’s plea. The unauthorized use of Johar’s name in the title and promotional materials violates his personality rights. The filmmakers are temporarily prohibited from releasing the film until the unauthorized use of Johar’s name is removed.