TN Govt Revokes Preventive Detention Order Against YouTuber Savukku Shankar, Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release

Today(25th Sept),The Tamil Nadu government informed the Supreme Court that it has revoked the preventive detention order against YouTuber Savukku Shankar related to a drugs case. The court ordered his immediate release, stating the Advisory Board recommended revoking the detention order.

“All Materials Relied on by Detaining Authorities to Justify Detention Must be Supplied to the Accused”: Supreme Court

Today(12th Sept), The Supreme Court ruled that individuals detained under preventive laws must receive all essential materials relied upon by authorities for their detention. However, documents referenced only in passing need not be provided.

Two Madras HC Judges Recuse from Hearing Habeas Corpus Plea Against ‘Savukku’ Shankar’s Detention Under Goondas Act

On Friday(26th July),The Madras High Court bench of Justice M.S. Ramesh and Justice Sunder Mohan has recused itself from A. Kamala’s habeas corpus plea challenging her son Savukku Shankar’s detention under the Goondas Act. The recusal follows Kamala’s remarks against the bench in a Supreme Court petition, highlighting concerns over freedom of speech and judicial independence.

Supreme Court Orders Interim Release of YouTuber Savukku Shankar, Questions the Necessity of Preventive Detention

The Supreme Court today ordered the interim release of YouTuber Savukku Shankar, criticizing the necessity of his preventive detention. It questioned the relevance of claims against him and emphasized the importance of visible justice. The Court urged expedited proceedings and delved into the possibility of an interim release, highlighting the case’s significance.

New Criminal Laws Fail to Decolonize Legal System: Retd. Justice S Muralidhar

On Sunday (28th April): Retired Justice S Muralidhar criticized the new criminal laws for failing to bring significant change or decolonization to the legal framework. He highlighted persistent outdated provisions and the laws’ failure to address human rights violations and provide fair compensation for wrongful prosecution. He urged aspiring lawyers to uphold their clients’ rights and defend them diligently.